TalkChess.com

Let's agree to disagree. I wonder where this misconception comes from, but C is NOT high level assembly, not even close. LLVM IR may be considered "high level assembly", but the term itself is dubious. I too did a lot of assembly in the past but C really is nothing like it, not even if you use some ...

I agree with most that you wrote. But Java really is super-simple compared to C++, I'd even say it's trivial. C++ is easily the most complex language out there (and I don't think it's a good thing, sane people don't like complexity). I also don't think that the comparison of C and high level assembl...

This is typically the result of the "design by a committee" approach: * some idiot, who just discovered namespaces, and wet his pants dreaming about them says: hey this is awesome, we should encapsulate C library in a namespace too! * someone else, likely the political kind, who knows it's a stupid...

Than you'd immediately stop using printf, because it's also a part or the C++ standard liblary, defined in header <cstdio>. You got it wrong, printf belongs to C runtime of course. cstdio is shitty wrapper which typically includes stdio.h internally, no magic here except it injects these C function...

Dann Corbit wrote: ↑

Sat Nov 10, 2018 12:46 am

Sharable link:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1hhhs3 ... sFdhWW41_y

Contains my tiny source change and a 64 bit Windows binary.

This compile of yours has asserts enabled (I get abs(score)<MATE at depth 9 from startpos). Did you actually test it?

Why pick definition of std gives me different result in stockfish and in a different code? When I click pick definition of std in the first line of main.cpp in stockfish it show me the fstream code but when I pick the same in a different file that has part of stockfish it shows me the ostream code ...

What you want is called "goto definition" in IDEs/Editors which support this feature.

So you tuned what exactly with Texel method? Piece values or imbalance?

"There is nothing to tune." really?! Then you must have some unknown source of elo, sitting on your hands and improving

I was out of luck with imbalance but for everything else Texel tuning worked extremely well.

I used to like IDEs, and goet fed up. Was using Codelite, and Code::Blocks. I guess these IDEs are good for doing GUI programming, although Qt Creator is probably a better choice for that. But for chess programming, I just use a terminal. Plain and simple. Text Editor + Clang/GCC. I'm not going to ...

Have you tried code::blocks? It behaves pretty much like Visual Studio and you can run it on Windows, Mac, and Linux. (I think the Mac version is old, though). The new versions are pretty nice. They find your compilers and let you choose which one you want for the project. You can trace along debug...