Search found 2578 matches

by Guenther
Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:16 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: New engine releases 2019
Replies: 56
Views: 7043

Re: New engine releases 2019

Haven't used Dreamer before. Any idea of its strength? Acording to GURL3 it is around 1600. To my surprise Dreamer 0.30 was already tested, while being private it seems. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MlNZmqqWmI3wDn3J0N0X0E1wzxrFPy-7Mq0aU39MVuM/edit#gid=907876490 PLAYER VERSION BITS CORES ...
by Guenther
Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:39 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: New engine releases 2019
Replies: 56
Views: 7043

Re: New engine releases 2019

DreamChess aka Dreamer 0.30 (after 11 years!)
http://dreamchess.org/

Cinnamon 2.1 (after 3 years)
http://cinnamonchess.altervista.org/
by Guenther
Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:44 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Allie 0.2
Replies: 8
Views: 586

Re: Allie 0.2

Modern Times wrote:
Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:30 pm
gonzochess75 wrote:
Sat Mar 23, 2019 12:41 am
Might I suggest the leelenstein networks that can be found here: https://www.patreon.com/jjosh :)
I don't see anything to download on that page ?
You have to pay first :)
by Guenther
Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:24 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Allie 0.1
Replies: 17
Views: 1742

Re: Allie 0.1

Eduard wrote:
Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:16 am
Question: Does AllieStein use the AB Search or MCTS, at the TCEC tournament Division 3?
According to its own output and the github site and the name of this thread by the author, its official name is now just 'Allie' (no more Stein in it) :)
by Guenther
Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:18 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Sabertooth Chess Engine
Replies: 7
Views: 557

Re: Sabertooth Chess Engine

Executable Winx64, is very weak, but it works correctly. code in published github https://github.com/dylhunn/sabertooth-source Exe: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NqUTizZOYCmJYcxnb_cgknu5sNQYCix8/view?usp=sharing It seems it is no static build, because it complains about a missing libwinpthread-1...
by Guenther
Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:22 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Sabertooth Chess Engine
Replies: 7
Views: 557

Re: Sabertooth Chess Engine

velmarin wrote:
Fri Mar 15, 2019 9:09 pm
One is C, and other go.

I guess they are different, although brothers.
Sabertooth simply was extremely buggy...
by Guenther
Fri Mar 15, 2019 8:35 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Sabertooth Chess Engine
Replies: 7
Views: 557

Re: Sabertooth Chess Engine

Engine by Dyl Hunn (Mac/Linux/Windows) https://github.com/dylhunn/sabertooth-source https://dylhunn.github.io/sabertooth/ Engine Creator:"Need Windows Compile...had trouble compiling for windows 64"....... :wink: It seems you neither read the essential and serious sites for computer chess engines.....
by Guenther
Fri Mar 15, 2019 6:04 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: SF downloads
Replies: 12
Views: 1331

Re: SF downloads

cma6 wrote:
Fri Mar 15, 2019 5:59 pm
Thanks Guenther:
Do you know the difference between the bmi1.exe and bmi2.exe files?
Sorry, I cannot answer this. If I had a bmi capable hardware I would simply try both and check, which one is faster.
by Guenther
Fri Mar 15, 2019 4:13 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: SF downloads
Replies: 12
Views: 1331

Re: SF downloads

There are some relatively recent updates on GitHub: https://github.com/lantonov/asmFish/tree/master/ I did get an antivirus warning with one of the Matefinder executables, probably a false alarm. Does it take in account the Counterply effort ? https://github.com/Counterply/asmFish/tree/asmFish-Coun...
by Guenther
Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:59 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Experiment 11 - Similarity between the top engines back then and now.
Replies: 14
Views: 1167

Re: Experiment 11 - Similarity between the top engines back then and now.

Rebel wrote:
Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:28 am

Today - http://rebel13.nl/text/anno-2019.txt
Pretty much healthy situation, computer chess healed itself.
This description sounds quite naive, especially considering the minimal sample.