Search found 3990 matches

by Vinvin
Fri Oct 30, 2020 12:53 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
Topic: Stockfish NNUE SV Tests
Replies: 122
Views: 41341

Re: Stockfish NNUE SV Tests

Default Net vs. SV 1520 Net: Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws 1 Corchess Default(eba324f53044) : 2405 7 7 2200 51.5 % 2395 76.9 % 2 Corchess SV 20200914-1520 : 2395 7 7 2200 48.5 % 2405 76.9 % Thanks ! Vincent
by Vinvin
Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:35 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
Topic: Stockfish NNUE SV Tests
Replies: 122
Views: 41341

Re: Stockfish NNUE SV Tests

Thanks ! Which nn-file did you use ? Latest or the one on the page ? 2 other very strong SF evolutions to test : Honey-12-R1 and Bluefish-12-R1 At the bottom of the page : https://github.com/MichaelB7/Stockfish/releases/tag/v12r1 May be you have to add the latest nn-file from here : https://tests.st...
by Vinvin
Sat Oct 24, 2020 10:30 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
Topic: Stockfish NNUE SV Tests
Replies: 122
Views: 41341

Re: Stockfish NNUE SV Tests

Please, would you mind to test "CorChess NNUE 1.3" ?
I saw very good results from it recently.

The executable is here : https://chess.ultimaiq.net/stockfish.html
You probably has to download the NN-file at the bottom of the page.

Thanks !
by Vinvin
Fri Oct 16, 2020 1:54 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
Replies: 65
Views: 7016

Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !

SF-NNUE depth 1 which is 500-1000 nodes is 2400Elo. That sounds unbelievable to me. Can you cite evidence for this 2400 figure? One ply is so tactically weak that I can't imagine how this could be even close to correct. I may run some tests myself. Do not be distressed. Tactics still rule! :lol: Me...
by Vinvin
Tue Oct 13, 2020 9:27 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
Replies: 65
Views: 7016

Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !

How well does the new Stockfish 12 work on Pentiums and i486? Reply from here : http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?p=863999#p863999 Some approximations here : http://www.talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=72485 http://www.talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=63857 A version close t...
by Vinvin
Mon Oct 12, 2020 5:25 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
Replies: 65
Views: 7016

Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !

How well does the new Stockfish 12 work on Pentiums and i486? Reply from here : http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?p=863999#p863999 Some approximations here : http://www.talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=72485 http://www.talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=63857 A version close t...
by Vinvin
Sun Oct 11, 2020 11:23 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Hard positions posted for 6 last moonths
Replies: 15
Views: 3662

Re: Hard positions posted for 6 last moonths

One more from here http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.p ... 21#p864521

77.e5!!
[d] 6r1/2kn1p2/2b1pp1p/2p4P/p1P1PKP1/3N1P2/3R4/6R1 w - - 17 77
by Vinvin
Sun Oct 11, 2020 10:58 pm
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !
Replies: 65
Views: 7016

Re: Stockfish bench in i486 & Pentium 75mhz !

I subscride to another provider. I have no more webspace. I uploaded the images to gifyu.com Some screenshots who got deleted from this thread : SF6 386-33mhz (~1000 NPS) https://s8.gifyu.com/images/sf6-386-33mhz.jpg SF6 486-33mhz (~2000 NPS) https://s8.gifyu.com/images/sf6-486-33mhz.jpg SF6 pentium...
by Vinvin
Thu Oct 08, 2020 1:27 am
Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
Topic: Lc0 with latest test30 nets is vastly superior positionally
Replies: 62
Views: 16112

Re: Lc0 with latest test30 nets is vastly superior positionally

Laskos wrote:
Sun Oct 04, 2020 3:22 pm
...
Lc0 LS15: 152
Lc0 J92-190: 145
Lc0 SV1541: 141

SFdev Hybrid: 138...
So, as SF is better than Lc0, that probably means that's not a good idea to be better positionally ? :lol: