I know some people have reported issues, but on my old computer I used hyper threading while testing and it seemed to work OK.
-Sam
Search found 1020 matches
- Wed Oct 18, 2017 1:58 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions
- Topic: New computer suggestions please
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6450
- Tue Oct 17, 2017 7:43 pm
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions
- Topic: New computer suggestions please
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6450
Re: New computer suggestions please
What kind of memory per core do others use for testing?
- Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:54 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions
- Topic: New computer suggestions please
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6450
New computer suggestions please
Considering starting working on Hannibal again. My development computer is old and broken; any suggestions on what hardware I should purchase that gives me good bang for the buck for running lots of simultaneous test games? It would be a nice bonus if the machine was also good for online tournament ...
- Sat Aug 13, 2016 11:17 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
- Topic: Hannibal 1.7
- Replies: 49
- Views: 15928
Re: Hannibal 1.7
I tried a compile for Windows XP. Message me if you want to beta test it for me. As soon as someone tells us it works, we will include it in the download package.
-Sam
-Sam
- Wed Aug 10, 2016 4:50 pm
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
- Topic: Hannibal 1.7
- Replies: 49
- Views: 15928
Re: Hannibal 1.7
I have to do a new compile for xp. I can do it tomorrow.MikeGL wrote:Windows XP 32 bit.Edsel Apostol wrote:What OS are you using? We don't have 32 bit OS anymore so that was not tested.
pgado daan
I can try with 64 bit OS, but its not Windows.
Sam
- Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:14 pm
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
- Topic: Hannibal 1.7
- Replies: 49
- Views: 15928
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Hannibal 1.7 is now available at https://sites.google.com/site/edapostol/hannibal It should be much stronger than 1.5. Please see the readme file for the list of changes. Thanks Edsel for the engine! I have a question: is it possible to write no logfile? best wishes Werner No, but we should add tha...
- Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:13 pm
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
- Topic: Hannibal 1.7
- Replies: 49
- Views: 15928
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Default settings are optimal (other than hash size or number of threads or such).Nordlandia wrote:Is default settings optimal for Hannibal 1.7?
I'm planning to test ponder.
-Sam
- Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:28 pm
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
- Topic: Hannibal 1.7
- Replies: 49
- Views: 15928
Re: Hannibal 1.7
Hello Edsel, I started a test already. If it gets into the TOP 16 it will throw out the old horse Naum :-) I remember Hanibal 1.5 having some ponder issues which causes a lot of time losses. The first 20 games of 1.7 are fine ... I am crossing fingers! Thanks for the version Ingo Ponder worked fine...
- Fri Dec 25, 2015 1:22 pm
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: Tournaments and Matches
- Topic: Nunemaker Chess Rating List (NCRL)
- Replies: 33
- Views: 11159
Re: Nunemaker Chess Rating List (NCRL)
Cool list. Enjoy the scalability aspect 
-Sam
-Sam
- Sat Oct 17, 2015 11:34 am
- Forum: Computer Chess Club: General Topics
- Topic: Martin on the SF loss on time
- Replies: 110
- Views: 35269
Re: Martin on the SF loss on time
It is not clear what "scales" means in this context. I have seen references to BOTH higher NPS, AND longer time-to-depth. If I had time, I'd run a few tests on it to see what it does on my 20 or 24 core boxes... But that's time away from working on my code, which is not exactly a good use of time. ...