TalkChess.com

If there are no original parts to Houdini, then no harm no foul. If there are, however, then you are violating the Houdini author’s copyright. He may have violated the GPL in modifying sf code and distributing it as he did. That does not make it OK to distribute it without his permission, and he cer...

Simply adding the NN output to the static eval looks too primitive to me... I'd be convinced if the NN output a king-pawn-configuration-dependent PST or even a whole set of eval constants to be then plugged into the static eval. Primitive was the objective. Maintain the uniqueness of the evaluation...

Tony P. wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 18, 2020 9:13 pm

dkappe wrote: ↑

Thu Apr 30, 2020 6:35 pm

On to a julia version.

Awesome, thanks! Just in case, Tord Romstad has changed the license of his Chess.jl to MIT this month

Good news.

How convenient of you to post all this while Ethereal at the same time is doing badly in TCEC and is about to get relegated in the lower league... TCEC is an event. Copyright violation is a crime. I stated my motivations. I presented my data. I'm now waiting to see if Norman comes out of hiding, un...

Somehow a leela style net that never saw positions with more than 18 pieces was able to “memorize” opening moves. Yet somehow people arguing this tired old argument are unable to memorize this refutation. :D You my friend have a conflict with a basic logic. The "fact" that the net with 18 pieces ca...

Somehow a leela style net that never saw positions with more than 18 pieces was able to “memorize” opening moves. Yet somehow people arguing this tired old argument are unable to memorize this refutation. :D You my friend have a conflict with a basic logic. The "fact" that the net with 18 pieces ca...

jhellis3 wrote: ↑

Sun Sep 13, 2020 11:49 pm

Lol? WTF?

Well, you did make me laugh anyway.... I'll give you that.

It seems that basic set theory reasoning and ad hominem are the only places you can detect a fallacy, so you shoehorn everything into them, whether it fits or not.

You remind me of that guy who prattles on and on about Hopfield networks, believing that just because they have “neural network” in their name, they have anything to do with ResNets. You *are* the Hopfield Networks guy . :lol: :lol: Perfectly fine. I was attacking your knowledge and understanding, ...

jhellis3 wrote: ↑

Sun Sep 13, 2020 11:32 pm

You feel that associating someone with Hopfield Networks is an ad hominem attack?

I never said that either. What strawman number is this, I have lost count....

Go back and read your own posts. We are done here.

You *are* the Hopfield Networks guy. :lol: :lol: Another ad hominem. This is strange behavior for someone embarrassing themselves, but whatever.... I think we are done here. You feel that associating someone with Hopfield Networks is an ad hominem attack? I wonder what other mathematical, statistic...