| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Daniel Shawul
Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Posts: 2187
Location: Ethiopia
|
 Post subject: Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:18 am |
  |
|
On the other hand the eval hash table seem to benefit from table sizes that don't fit in cache. So it is better to make that one as large as possible at least for my case. I haven't tried to do multiple probes on eval cache (could do as many as 8 now) but it could be slower anyway.
| Code: |
eht 131072 X 8 = 1.0 MB
Nodes Time NPS splits bad
===== ==== === ====== ===
11302581 10.01 1129354 0 0
8579006 10.06 852529 0 0
9461160 10.02 943756 0 0
8462623 10.07 840296 0 0
9070314 10.07 900905 0 0
eht 262144 X 8 = 2.0 MB
Nodes Time NPS splits bad
===== ==== === ====== ===
12170249 10.02 1214474 0 0
9139824 10.07 907719 0 0
10205033 10.08 1012605 0 0
9010540 10.03 898538 0 0
9549341 10.06 948861 0 0
eht 524288 X 8 = 4.0 MB
Nodes Time NPS splits bad
===== ==== === ====== ===
12069183 10.08 1197102 0 0
9421721 10.05 937204 0 0
10305004 10.01 1029676 0 0
9386986 10.05 933842 0 0
9677800 10.03 964596 0 0
eht 1048576 X 8 = 8.0 MB
Nodes Time NPS splits bad
===== ==== === ====== ===
12290810 10.05 1222844 0 0
9658184 10.02 964083 0 0
10083317 10.05 1003814 0 0
9443193 10.07 937941 0 0
9601357 10.03 957454 0 0
eht 2097152 X 8 = 16.0 MB
Nodes Time NPS splits bad
===== ==== === ====== ===
12133155 10.08 1204044 0 0
9805887 10.15 966002 0 0
10405001 10.07 1033369 0 0
9568498 10.04 953227 0 0
9652816 10.04 961244 0 0
eht 4194304 X 8 = 32.0 MB
Nodes Time NPS splits bad
===== ==== === ====== ===
11828739 10.03 1178748 0 0
9826144 10.11 971538 0 0
10405001 10.04 1036148 0 0
9588020 10.00 958802 0 0
9634780 10.02 961267 0 0
eht 8388608 X 8 = 64.0 MB
Nodes Time NPS splits bad
===== ==== === ====== ===
11581301 10.06 1151451 0 0
9712524 10.08 963161 0 0
10188976 10.05 1014232 0 0
9510707 10.06 945774 0 0
9465668 10.02 944300 0 0
eht 16777216 X 8 = 128.0 MB
Nodes Time NPS splits bad
===== ==== === ====== ===
11973523 10.03 1193176 0 0
9726373 10.09 963579 0 0
10205033 10.09 1011701 0 0
9500346 10.05 945778 0 0
9423519 10.01 941222 0 0
|
_________________
https://sites.google.com/site/dshawul/
https://github.com/dshawul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
 Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Fermin Serrano |
Tue Jul 10, 2012 9:24 pm |
| Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Robert Hyatt |
Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:20 pm |
| Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Lucas Braesch |
Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:08 am |
| Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:54 am |
| Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:49 pm |
| Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Daniel Shawul |
Thu Jul 12, 2012 2:41 am |
| Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Fermin Serrano |
Mon Jul 16, 2012 12:03 pm |
| Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Lucas Braesch |
Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:06 pm |
| Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Fermin Serrano |
Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:47 pm |
| Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Daniel Shawul |
Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:18 am |
| Re: Is there a reasonable number of pawn hash entries? |
Marcel van Kervinck |
Sat Jul 14, 2012 10:46 am |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
