| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jan Brouwer
Joined: 22 Mar 2007 Posts: 198 Location: Netherlands
|
Post subject: Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 9:13 pm |
|
|
| Jouni wrote: |
| I had just one basic question in mind: why can't operating system (OS) do MP thing automatically?! Simply run software with all available CPU units automatically as fast as possible. Can't be too impossible to OS - or is it? |
People can parallelize a program, so in principle a program can parallelize a program as well.
First, write a serial chess program in a functional language to ease synchronization between multiple threads.
Then design another program which performs transformations on the chess program while maintaining correctness, and introduces additional threads to increase parallelism.
Finally, we we need a optimization program to find the best performing transformations for the second program to apply to the first program.
I mean, how hard can that be?
Jan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Howard Exner |
Sat May 26, 2012 6:32 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Matthew R. Brades |
Sat May 26, 2012 7:21 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Jon Dart |
Sat May 26, 2012 11:22 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Howard Exner |
Tue May 29, 2012 5:53 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Tue May 29, 2012 6:51 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Ronald de Man |
Tue May 29, 2012 7:18 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Mon May 28, 2012 3:09 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Jouni Uski |
Mon May 28, 2012 5:33 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Uri Blass |
Tue May 29, 2012 8:39 am |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Alexander Zacharias |
Thu Jun 07, 2012 1:05 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Ricardo Barreira |
Tue May 29, 2012 9:19 am |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Joona Kiiski |
Tue May 29, 2012 12:03 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Ricardo Barreira |
Tue May 29, 2012 1:27 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Daniel Shawul |
Tue May 29, 2012 1:03 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Robert Hyatt |
Tue May 29, 2012 3:18 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Tue May 29, 2012 4:03 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Daniel Shawul |
Tue May 29, 2012 4:31 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Tue May 29, 2012 6:33 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Robert Hyatt |
Wed May 30, 2012 6:25 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sat Jun 02, 2012 4:07 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Jan Brouwer |
Wed May 30, 2012 9:13 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Daniel Shawul |
Wed May 30, 2012 9:36 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:58 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Ricardo Barreira |
Thu May 31, 2012 8:26 am |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Robert Hyatt |
Thu May 31, 2012 3:30 pm |
Re: MP Implementation: One Method or Varied? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:57 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|