| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Larry Kaufman
Joined: 10 Jan 2010 Posts: 1229 Location: Maryland USA
|
Post subject: Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:31 pm |
|
|
| zamar wrote: |
In short, the idea is that pieces affect the value of each other. Here we give bonus and penalties for different duos (like bishop and knight, pawn and pawn, queen and rook, etc.). "Bishop pair" is a special piece in this implementation.
But as Marco already mentioned, this is not a big deal, maybe around +15 elo or sth like that. We expected more, but fine tuning was extremely difficult. |
Is this +15 elo for the duos other than bishop pair and redundant major pieces, or does it include either (or both) of them? If it excludes those duos, I would say that +15 elo is pretty good. I have never been convinced that any duo other than those plus various (piece with pawn) terms have value. Possibly a slight negative for the knight pair may be justified. Perhaps some of the duos involving enemy pieces might pay off, I never did much work on that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 05, 2010 4:39 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Wed May 05, 2010 4:48 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 05, 2010 5:37 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Wed May 05, 2010 5:47 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Jan Brouwer |
Wed May 05, 2010 5:49 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Wed May 05, 2010 7:25 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 05, 2010 8:02 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Wed May 05, 2010 10:10 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Wed May 05, 2010 10:30 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Wed May 05, 2010 10:47 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 05, 2010 11:27 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Thu May 06, 2010 1:23 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Thu May 06, 2010 9:07 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Sven Schüle |
Thu May 06, 2010 9:31 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Thu May 06, 2010 9:52 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Sven Schüle |
Thu May 06, 2010 10:48 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Thu May 06, 2010 12:08 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Tord Romstad |
Thu May 06, 2010 8:24 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Thu May 06, 2010 1:19 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Fri May 07, 2010 9:34 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Sat May 08, 2010 12:48 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Sat May 08, 2010 1:47 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marcel van Kervinck |
Sat May 08, 2010 2:01 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Thu May 06, 2010 11:40 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Wed May 05, 2010 10:42 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Joona Kiiski |
Wed May 05, 2010 7:54 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 05, 2010 8:28 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Larry Kaufman |
Sun May 27, 2012 7:31 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Tord Romstad |
Thu May 06, 2010 8:16 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
James Coit |
Thu May 06, 2010 10:13 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vratko Polák |
Thu May 06, 2010 11:38 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Fri May 07, 2010 12:15 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Fri May 07, 2010 5:39 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Fri May 07, 2010 8:09 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Fri May 07, 2010 8:25 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Sven Schüle |
Fri May 07, 2010 9:48 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Sven Schüle |
Fri May 07, 2010 10:31 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Fri May 07, 2010 10:54 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Fri May 07, 2010 10:31 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sat May 08, 2010 1:33 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Sat May 08, 2010 2:29 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sat May 08, 2010 4:24 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sat May 08, 2010 7:54 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sun May 09, 2010 3:19 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Sun May 09, 2010 4:47 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sun May 09, 2010 7:51 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Sun May 09, 2010 10:47 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sun May 09, 2010 11:22 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Mon May 10, 2010 4:58 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Sven Schüle |
Mon May 10, 2010 7:39 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Mon May 10, 2010 10:22 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Mon May 10, 2010 5:04 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Mon May 10, 2010 9:35 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Tue May 11, 2010 11:19 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Tue May 11, 2010 1:51 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Tue May 11, 2010 9:38 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Wed May 12, 2010 5:05 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Robert Hyatt |
Wed May 12, 2010 6:14 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Wed May 12, 2010 6:39 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Thu May 13, 2010 12:51 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 12, 2010 8:13 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 12, 2010 9:15 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Wed May 12, 2010 9:34 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 12, 2010 10:02 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Sat May 08, 2010 4:53 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sat May 08, 2010 7:03 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:10 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:24 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
grzegorzs |
Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:36 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Dann Corbit |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:43 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:43 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:44 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Joona Kiiski |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:55 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:30 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:30 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:11 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:31 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:57 pm |
Crazy talk |
Ben-Hur Carlos Langoni |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:07 pm |
Re: Crazy talk |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:36 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ben Stoker |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:07 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:54 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Robert Hyatt |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:27 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Dann Corbit |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:30 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Wylie Garvin |
Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:00 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Tu Ngoc Trung |
Sun May 27, 2012 2:22 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ferdinand Mosca |
Sun May 27, 2012 10:01 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Tu Ngoc Trung |
Mon May 28, 2012 3:19 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Mon May 28, 2012 4:19 am |