| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ronald de Man
Joined: 28 Feb 2012 Posts: 841
|
Post subject: Re: TT question? Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 1:23 pm |
|
|
| diep wrote: |
| Oh dear. 'lowering the total node count' is never the goal. Lowering time is the goal. Especially near the qsearch this is a crucial difference. |
This is why I mentioned the word trade-off. It's a trade-off between lower nps and lower total number of nodes for the same depth. So I was already talking about time-to-ply.
| Quote: |
| So time to ply always is the superior measure here. |
Here it is. In general, it is not. Tweaking null-move parameters and other reductions will also affect the quality of a fixed-depth search. In that case, time-to-ply isn't telling you the whole story anymore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
TT question? |
Fermin Serrano |
Sat May 19, 2012 10:54 am |
Re: TT question? |
Ronald de Man |
Sat May 19, 2012 11:10 am |
Re: TT question? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sat May 19, 2012 1:05 pm |
Re: TT question? |
Ronald de Man |
Sat May 19, 2012 1:23 pm |
Re: TT question? |
Lucas Braesch |
Sun May 20, 2012 4:29 am |
Re: TT question? |
Lucas Braesch |
Sun May 20, 2012 8:35 am |
Re: TT question? |
Matthew R. Brades |
Sun May 20, 2012 8:40 am |
Re: TT question? |
Lucas Braesch |
Sun May 20, 2012 12:17 pm |
Re: TT question? |
Matthew R. Brades |
Sun May 20, 2012 1:18 pm |
Re: TT question? |
H.G.Muller |
Sat May 19, 2012 11:20 am |
Re: TT question? |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sat May 19, 2012 1:07 pm |
Re: TT question? |
Mincho Georgiev |
Sun May 20, 2012 8:47 am |
Re: TT question? |
Matthew R. Brades |
Sun May 20, 2012 9:21 am |
Re: TT question? |
Martin Sedlak |
Sun May 20, 2012 10:06 am |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|