| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tom Casanovas
Joined: 16 Apr 2006 Posts: 327
|
Post subject: Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:12 am |
|
|
TEST STOCKFISH 120331 PETERPAN
i7 9750 3.33 Ghz.
4 real cores Critter DR and Houdini
4 real cores + 2 HT Stockfish INTEL
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Masterbook 3.1
Time control: 2 minutes + 2 sec/game.
Ponder: Off.
No tablebases
Stockfish 120331P6Int - Critter 1.4a 64-bit SSE4x4 18.5 - 21.5 +5/=27/-8 46.25%
Stockfish 120331P6Int - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64(x4) 18.0 - 22.0 +3/=30/-7 45.00%
Stockfish 120331P6Int - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64(x4) 13.0 - 27.0 +4/=18/-18 32.50%
http://www.mediafire.com/?19da71cenelaeqr
I7 980 3.33 Ghz.
Critter, Houdini, Deep Rybka 6 real cores - NO HT
Stockfish 6 real cores + 2 HT AMD
GUI: Fritz 12
Book: Perfect 2012
Time control: 2 minutes +2 sec/ game.
Ponder: Off
No tablebases
Stockfish 120331P8Amd - Critter 1.4a 64-bit SSE4(x6) 21.0 - 19.0 +11/=20/-9 52.50%
Stockfish 120331P8Amd - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 (x6) 21.0 - 19.0 +11/=20/-9 52.50%
Stockfish 120331P8Amd - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64(x6) 18.0 - 22.0 +7/=22/-11 45.00%
http://www.mediafire.com/?nwfcsilebo9scbf
GLOBAL TEST FOR STOCKFISH20120331 PETERPAN AFTER 240 GAMES.
Stockfish 120331PInt - Critter 1.4a 64-bit SSE4 39.5 -40.5 +16/=47/-17 49.37%
Stockfish 120331PInt - Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 39.0 - 41.0 +14/=50/-16 48.75%
Stockfish 120331PInt - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 31.0 - 49.0 +11/=40/-29 38.75%
Average result: 45.63%
The Intel version seems weak, although its speed is not bad. However the AMD version has shown a relevant strength in this test. (Please note that my computers are not AMD but INTEL).
Regards from Barcelona.
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:42 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:16 am |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
George Speight |
Mon Feb 13, 2012 6:23 am |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:34 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:10 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Tue Mar 06, 2012 5:45 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:58 am |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:53 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Gary |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:20 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:55 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:12 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Gary |
Thu Mar 22, 2012 8:15 pm |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:13 am |
Re: Testing new compiles of Stockfish. |
Tom Casanovas |
Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:12 am |
A very strong AMD compile. |
Tom Casanovas |
Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:33 am |
Re: A very strong AMD compile. |
Tom Glenn |
Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:23 pm |
Re: A very strong AMD compile. |
Tom Casanovas |
Mon Apr 16, 2012 3:31 pm |
Re: A very strong AMD compile. |
Ernest Bonnem |
Mon Apr 16, 2012 5:56 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|