| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Edmund Moshammer
Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 598 Location: St. Gallen, Switzerland
|
Post subject: Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:42 pm |
|
|
Thanks to hgm and lucas for the suggestions.
Below you find updated graphs representing the same data.
1) bin-size is 4 elo-points
2) minimum bin-size is 4 samples
3) in the elo-delta graph I shifted all models by 20 elo points to compensate for the white to move advantage
4) I added the cdf of the normal distribution with sd=250
5) I added the function hgm suggested to estimate draws scaling by 40/25
Agreed, the gauss function is a better fit than either the linear function or the logistic function.
Looking at the new graphs I am not so sure about hgms suggestion regarding the progression of the avg-elo score function. You are right that the next step is to take elo-delta into the equation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Edmund Moshammer |
Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:22 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:56 am |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Edmund Moshammer |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:49 am |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:44 am |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Lucas Braesch |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:06 am |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:29 am |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Edmund Moshammer |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:42 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Edmund Moshammer |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:52 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:26 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Edmund Moshammer |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:13 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:33 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Edmund Moshammer |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:18 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Adam Hair |
Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:00 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Adam Hair |
Mon Jul 02, 2012 1:25 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Adam Hair |
Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:48 am |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Adam Hair |
Sun Jul 01, 2012 8:47 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Edmund Moshammer |
Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:55 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Adam Hair |
Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:37 am |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Adam Hair |
Mon Jul 02, 2012 1:27 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Marco Costalba |
Sun Jul 01, 2012 7:17 am |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Lucas Braesch |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:53 am |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Daniel Shawul |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:01 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Rémi Coulom |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:29 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:20 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Rémi Coulom |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 3:52 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:12 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Rémi Coulom |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:13 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
H.G.Muller |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:27 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Rémi Coulom |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:32 pm |
Re: Advantage for White; Bayeselo (to Rémi Coulom) |
Daniel Shawul |
Wed Sep 12, 2012 12:18 am |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|