| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dr.Wael Deeb

Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8617 Location: Amman,Jordan
|
Post subject: Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:10 pm |
|
|
| Don wrote: |
| Dr.Wael Deeb wrote: |
| diep wrote: |
| Don wrote: |
| diep wrote: |
6 seconds a game type time controls are giving zero information back as compared to alternative forms of testing. |
Don't you believe in time control testing? By the way, this is not 6 seconds per game, it's Fischer 6 + 0.1 which is roughly equivalent to 12 seconds per side per game - a typical 60 move game should last about 24 seconds. We do not like sudden death time controls. |
We have lots of people posting nonsense into this forum, but they all forget that most engine authors here basically produced something similar to rybka and basically got the first 3200 elopoints for free, and therefore are far from genius improving those engines by a few elopoints.
The fact no one claimed source code ownership of that code, nor started huge courtcases, also clearly proves it all was government sponsored; only governments are stupid enough to do so.
If you play engines that are very similar to each other against each other, then usually the one searching deeper wins.
All this 6 seconds a game time controls won't improve the beancounter engines much of course.
You can also prove of course that most algorithms invented in 90s, i invented a couple of dozens, if i retest most of them now, that back then Diep just didn't have the system time, so didn't get enough nodes per search, to even remotely break even with those algorithms.
At 6 seconds entire game you won't be getting enough nodes per search either to break even.
6 seconds single core entire game, what is it: 0.1 second a move or so.
0.1 * what do you get single core, like 2 million nps?
So we speak about 200k nodes for each search.
That's not gonna show of course whether a new 'search enhancement' is working.
It's just looking great on this forum and will prove nothing of course. |
It's a stupid time control indeed.... |
Brilliant comment. |
Don,don't take it personally or as a direct strike toward you....
Through all these years when I started testing computer chess programs,I've always avoided such ultra fast time controls....as you everyone can see from the above thread,they're useless to say the least....
Dr.D _________________ It ain't about how hard you can hit,it's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward,how much you can take and keep moving forward. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Teodoriu Catalin |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:17 pm |
Re: NUMBER 1 ENGINE ON LONG TIME CONTROLS |
Uri Blass |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:52 pm |
Re: NUMBER 1 ENGINE ON LONG TIME CONTROLS |
Teodoriu Catalin |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:02 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:01 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Lonnie Cook |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:21 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:16 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Robert Houdart |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:40 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:51 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Robert Houdart |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:13 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:29 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:30 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Tom Giampietro |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:05 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:40 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Robert Houdart |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:52 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Peter Skinner |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:54 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Carl Bicknell |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:57 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ben-Hur Carlos Langoni |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:22 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Carl Bicknell |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:00 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ben-Hur Carlos Langoni |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:04 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
George Speight |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:37 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:43 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Sedat Canbaz |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:54 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ben-Hur Carlos Langoni |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:17 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Sedat Canbaz |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:05 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Sedat Canbaz |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:57 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:57 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:33 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:41 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:51 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:34 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ricardo Barreira |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:54 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:53 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:35 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Jouni Uski |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:18 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Robert Houdart |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:26 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:50 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:56 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:04 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:22 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:31 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:48 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:52 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:11 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:19 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:35 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:58 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:38 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:40 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:06 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:06 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:22 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:50 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:30 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:31 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:57 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:06 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Jouni Uski |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:10 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 8:31 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Bigler |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:52 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Larry Kaufman |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:58 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Bigler |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:03 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Larry Kaufman |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:46 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Terry McCracken |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:37 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Carl Bicknell |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:19 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Terry McCracken |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:49 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:59 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Terry McCracken |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:52 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Uri Blass |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:05 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Bram Mourik |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:01 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:30 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:37 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Bram Mourik |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:58 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 6:25 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
om prakash |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:00 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
enrico fagiuoli |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:43 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Leon Coleman |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:23 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:47 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:44 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:30 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:34 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
enrico fagiuoli |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 2:57 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:48 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
enrico fagiuoli |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:09 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:20 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:26 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:51 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:55 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:49 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:10 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:30 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:43 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:14 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:31 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:45 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:58 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:26 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:23 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Carl Bicknell |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:41 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:59 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:10 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Carl Bicknell |
Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:49 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:36 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Robert Flesher |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:28 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:55 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Jon Dart |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:09 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Andrew R. Case |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:14 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Gabor Szots |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 2:19 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:21 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
om prakash |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:16 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:51 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
om prakash |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:54 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
George Speight |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:42 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Jouni Uski |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:35 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Maurizio Maglio |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:41 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:34 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|