| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Vincent Diepeveen
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 1738 Location: The Netherlands
|
Post subject: Re: Tuning again Posted: Thu Nov 10, 2011 4:28 pm |
|
|
| Rebel wrote: |
Hi Vincent,
Nice to hear from you again.
| diep wrote: |
Hi Ed,
In itself running fixed depth matches is not a bad idea. However it tunes a lot better if you get through tactical barrier. That barrier is far above 8 ply. |
Of course you are right and in an ideal world I would use 16 plies. But 8 ply plus 10,000+ games is good enough nevertheless since the volume weeds out the randomness. |
8 ply is too little. The randomness of the shallow search not getting through tactical barrier means you suddenly need 100k games instead of 10k with a bit deeper search depth, as randomness always converges towards equality (50% score). So randomness you can never filter out very well as it has the tendency to converge towards that 50% score. Avoiding randomness in the first place should be your main focus.
Even then it will never tune accurately of course, they use better ways of tuning than this nonsense testing. For this if i may refer to that Stockfish team first says they test 1000 games at 1 0 level, now statement is they test at 5 seconds a game + 0.1 , whereas they're higher rated than crafty and crafty already had to move up in time control, meanwhile crafty plays 40k games, not 1000. Then even despite being retired i assume you smell the contradiction of the random statements the dudes do here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Tuning again |
Ed Schroder |
Tue Nov 01, 2011 10:20 am |
Re: Tuning again |
Edmund Moshammer |
Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:42 am |
Re: Tuning again |
Ed Schroder |
Tue Nov 01, 2011 4:13 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Robert Hyatt |
Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:04 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Joona Kiiski |
Tue Nov 01, 2011 4:20 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Ed Schroder |
Tue Nov 01, 2011 6:11 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Joona Kiiski |
Tue Nov 01, 2011 7:25 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Marco Costalba |
Tue Nov 01, 2011 9:30 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Ed Schroder |
Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:55 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Marco Costalba |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:04 am |
Re: Tuning again |
Ed Schroder |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:29 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Michael Hoffmann |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:00 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Larry Kaufman |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:04 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:52 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Larry Kaufman |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:59 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Sam Hamilton |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:18 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:29 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Ed Schroder |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:36 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:56 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Sam Hamilton |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:45 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Ricardo Barreira |
Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:23 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Robert Hyatt |
Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:11 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Ricardo Barreira |
Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:39 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
H.G.Muller |
Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:43 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Robert Hyatt |
Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:08 am |
Re: Tuning again |
H.G.Muller |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 5:24 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Ed Schroder |
Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:16 am |
Re: Tuning again |
Steve B |
Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:20 am |
Re: Tuning again |
Rein Halbersma |
Wed Nov 02, 2011 6:32 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
david nash |
Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:57 am |
Re: Tuning again |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sun Nov 06, 2011 3:50 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Ed Schroder |
Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:27 am |
Re: Tuning again |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Thu Nov 10, 2011 4:28 pm |
Re: Tuning again |
Sergei S. Markoff |
Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:11 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|