| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Robert Hyatt
Joined: 27 Feb 2006 Posts: 15819 Location: Birmingham, AL
|
Post subject: Re: Court case victory to Chessbase Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:00 pm |
|
|
| Laskos wrote: |
| bob wrote: |
| Laskos wrote: |
| bob wrote: |
| Many courts have already ruled that you can _not_ copyright a chess game, because chess games are "enumerable" and one can write a program which, given enough time, can enumerate every possible game of chess that can be played. |
Funny, every literary text is enumerable, hope the courts from now on will not allow them to fall under copyright protection, given the Chessbase precedent.
I just wrote such a program and it gave me
"one can write a program which, given enough time, can enumerate every possible game of chess that can be played" in 2 seconds.
Kai |
This isn't true. There are an infinite number of possible "literary texts". You can insert words for as long as you want. Chess, however, is finite, because of the rules (most notably the 50 move rule). |
Funny again. Admitting that chess is enumerable, the only reason a literary text could not be enumerable is because it could be infinite? Does such text exist? Even this is irrelevant, as you seem to miss my main point. Both chess and MY utterance "I am" are innumerable.
Kai |
I have no idea what you are talking about. "I am" can be enumerated easily. 4 loops, nested, each looping over all alpha characters and space, one loop for each of four positions. You get "I am" quickly. But for the general case, you have to have an infinite number of nested loops because there is no rule saying that "once you use N characters, you can't add another. In text, you can _always_ add another. Chess is finite. And I don't want to hear the silly "50 move is optional." Show me a game where 2 players decided to play on beyond 50 moves, _intentionally_. I've played in a ton of tournaments over the years (as a human player and operating a chess program against humans) and I have _never_ seen it happen. Realistically, the game is finite as it is zero-sum.
Does an infinite-length exist? Funny. But for any length text you produce, I can produce one that is one word longer... And we _never_ reach a point where that is no longer true.
With chess, 3900 moves or so and the game is over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Court case victory to Chessbase |
Graham Banks |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:08 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Ted Wong |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:53 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Albert Silver |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:29 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Ernest Bonnem |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:03 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Albert Silver |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:42 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Greg Simpson |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:40 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Albert Silver |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 6:44 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Greg Simpson |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:27 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Albert Silver |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:14 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Sven Schüle |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 9:12 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Greg Simpson |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:10 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Albert Silver |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:41 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Greg Simpson |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 8:34 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Robert Hyatt |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:38 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Kai Laskos |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:00 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Steven Atkinson |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:21 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:53 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Albert Silver |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:00 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Dann Corbit |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:27 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:27 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Albert Silver |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:43 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:36 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Albert Silver |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:55 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Robert Hyatt |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:24 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Greg Simpson |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:33 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Robert Hyatt |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 3:55 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Kai Laskos |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:53 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Alex Brown |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:48 am |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Robert Hyatt |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:00 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:33 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Robert Hyatt |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:32 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:48 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 4:40 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Robert Hyatt |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:34 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Sat Apr 16, 2011 5:50 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Steven Atkinson |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:22 pm |
Re: Court case victory to Chessbase |
Graham Banks |
Fri Apr 15, 2011 8:29 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|