ChessUSA.com TalkChess.com
Hosted by Your Move Chess & Games
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich
Post new topic    TalkChess.com Forum Index -> Computer Chess Club: General Topics Flat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Robert Hyatt



Joined: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 20315
Location: Birmingham, AL

PostPost subject: Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich    Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:05 pm Reply to topic Reply with quote

Sven Schüle wrote:
bob wrote:
Sven Schüle wrote:
These percentages are very plausible for me. I don't know whether many non-programmers can follow but nevertheless I suggest to all interested members to reread what I already posted five weeks ago on that topic (EO subforum). Read especially my quite detailled comments on each of the points from Zach's pages under the heading "My details". If I had to match these 11 points with the 40-40-20 estimate by Vas then I would perhaps come to similar numbers as he did.

One note @Zach here: for me claiming that something is "wrong", or "standard CC concept" does not mean anything about your competence, and also nothing personal. I just try to keep as objective as possible. If someone would make 4 wrong statements out of 11 then this does not turn him "incompetent" at all. Just to let you know. EDIT: I see no reason why Vas should view this differently.

I believe that I responded to your post back then point by point also. Your "refutation" offers _zero_ details. And I _do_ mean _zero_. When we started the analysis, we were comparing rybka binary to fruit source, and since the binary is stripped of symbols, and since it is in asm, it takes some work to go from asm back to C. And that code was posted here. And there were howls of protest because our goal was to take the binary and map it directly back to C that matches fruit. I tried to point out that C to binary is a many-to-one mapping, as there are many ways to code up an algorithm where the source looks completely different but the binary is identical. Students try this all the time by changing variable names, procedure names, switching from a for loop to a while loop, and so forth. So going blindly from asm to C is not helpful, but _if_ you ask the question, "Can I use this assembly code, in its entirety without adding instructions or having any left over, and map it back to the exact C source in fruit?" then the answer was yes in more than one instance, the first was the main loop where commands are read and the infamous do_parse() procedure is called.

If you don't accept any of that, that's your choice. But there _is_ ample evidence to show that code was copied. It is not about how much was copied, it is about was _any_ copied, and the answer is most certainly "yes". It is time to get out from behind this false cover of "not too much" or "just a little". One more time, you can't be just a little bit pregnant. Ideas are not the same as code. We are talking about _code_.

Another new excuse is "Rybka is bitboard, fruit is not, can't be copied". Baloney. Much of my early evaluation was not bitboard since I have always maintained a mailbox copy of the board to make it easy to figure out what piece is on a particular square. And I converted that code directly to bitboard code later. Are you _really_ saying that is not copied. When I copy A to B, then modify B to use a different board representation, and now B is not a copy of A. That's convoluted thinking, to be kind about it.

What if the robo* guys convert from bitboards? Are they _also_ OK by this definition, even though it looks more and more like they are already OK, based on continually arriving data.

"Zero details" is as imprecise as possible. This was part of my post that I linked to above:
Code:
piece square tables:
- I can see no similar code, just similar values used[/quote]

"piece/square tables have _NO_ code.  Just values.  So exactly what does the above mean?

[quote]


pawn_get_info():
- I can see no similar code, just ideas may have been reused[/quote]

You have to read Zach's comments.  If you take fruit, convert it to bitboards, the code will, of necessity, morph significantly.  Yet if one is interested, one can "un-morph" the code to see how it looked pre-bitboard, and then draw conclusions.  Zach mentioned exactly this.

[quote]


eval_piece():
- "Rybka code" may look similar but is a bitboard translation with several other changes, so only ideas were reused but no literal code copying[/quote]

That is simply utter baloney.  If one looks carefully, one can find code in the released version of Cray Blitz that was copied, converted to bitboards, and then used "as is".  So that isn't copying code?  Would it be ok for the IP* guys to convert back to a mailbox board representation.  would that stop all complaints since the code would no longer match anything in Rybka perfectly.  This is flawed logic.  _badly_ flawed logic.

[quote]


eval_king():

- using a flag that defines whether king safety is used or not is a common idea that many programs share, and its existence in R1 does not prove copying of code but just reusing an idea

- attacks evaluation is a bitboard translation, so the code is changed => only idea reused[/quote]

same bogus idea, once again.  Copy the code, modify it to use bitboards, all is OK.  Copy a book, convert from English to German, all is now ok since the text does not match.

[quote]

- final score calculation: one source line is shown that contains the same idea in R1 as in Fruit but has 3 changes in R1, so no unchanged literal code copying

- shelter: implementations show look quite similar BUT Zach states that this code is not present in Rybka binary but is "an equivalent" created manually by Zach so this can be ZERO proof for anything[/quote]


Someone copies book written in English.  Converts to German.  Converting the German version back to English for comparison is "zero proof"?

[quote]
  "All of this shelter evaluation code in Rybka above is an equivalent; it doesn't appear in the Rybka binary. It is there simply to illustrate what is in the precomputed tables. These precomputed tables are used during the pawn evaluation to quickly evaluate shelters."

- storm: very different code, only same ideas


eval_passer():
- "Rybka code" presented looks very different, just ideas may have been reused


eval_pattern():
- common ideas but completely different implementations


material:
- implementations of "MatKingFlag", "DrawBishopFlag", and game phase look quite similar
  => assembler code of R1 should be shown to prove that the code shown as "Rybka" is really in R1, and not part of Strelka source only (which would not prove anything)

How is that "zero"? You have to open a second browser window or tab with the related Zach pages, of course, to see, parse, and understand what I mean. Is it that difficult to get the meaning of my comment that I see no similarities of the presented code pieces left and right side, for instance? Do I have to repeat what is written on Zach's pages to make my comment more readable? I guess no. I guess you have not even read my comments to 11 points. That excuses your reply.

Regarding "bitboard translation": yes, if I copy code and modify it to use bitboards then it is no longer a literal copy. Simple.

Regarding "asm to C", this was not my topic at all in my referenced post, you have drifted to another topic with that.

Regarding "copying actual code" and "a little bit pregnant", you simply can't show actual code copying merely with a website like Zach's where left and right sides do not match, it needs some more work like the recent one from "BB" for that IMO. So *there is no code copying proven*. It is proven, and was admitted very early by Vasik, that R1 was influenced by many Fruit ideas. He says "legally", would you assume he does not know what that means, as a software developer? You say something like: he copied the evaluation code from Fruit to Rybka and adapted it to match the Rybka needs. He says something like: he wrote original code, took some ideas from Fruit and legally implemented them in Rybka. You come and say he is dishonest, and you "prove" that with a website where left and right sides do not match but the text says they were "virtually identical". A couple of serious chess programmers raise their doubts. But you insist. Fabien does not care about it, he obviously has no strong feelings in this area.

Why do you insist on this campaign, Bob?


I also think that it is important to carefully clean up the accusation that Rybka were derived from Fruit, simply because this "derivation" assumption may serve as kind of an excuse for having been allowed to publish parts of copyrighted material as "public domain" source code, provided that has happened (still open for me although many think that everything's fine now after the "BB report").

Sven


I am not going thru the rest of your comments point by point as that serves no purpose. If you don't want to believe he copied code, that's your choice. But certainly nothing you offer above says _anything_ about the topic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Subject Author Date/Time
My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Sven Schüle Sun Jun 13, 2010 11:52 am
      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich gerold daniels Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:12 pm
            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Dr.Wael Deeb Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:18 pm
                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Harvey Williamson Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:27 pm
                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Dr.Wael Deeb Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:54 pm
                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Steve B Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:49 pm
                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Dr.Wael Deeb Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:56 pm
      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Ben Stoker Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:47 pm
            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Harvey Williamson Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:50 pm
                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Albert Silver Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:54 pm
                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Harvey Williamson Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:56 pm
                              Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Albert Silver Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:01 pm
                                    Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Harvey Williamson Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:03 pm
                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Albert Silver Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:07 pm
                                                Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Ben Stoker Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:24 pm
                                                      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Robert Hyatt Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:00 pm
            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Uri Blass Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:38 pm
                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Harvey Williamson Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:44 pm
            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Robert Hyatt Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:58 pm
                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Rolf Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:43 pm
                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Robert Hyatt Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:01 pm
      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Highendman Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:25 pm
      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Alexander Schmidt Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:36 pm
            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Albert Silver Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:44 pm
                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Alexander Schmidt Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:30 pm
                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Albert Silver Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:39 pm
                              Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Alexander Schmidt Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:44 pm
                                    Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Alexander Schmidt Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:45 pm
                                    Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Graham Banks Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:48 pm
                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Alexander Schmidt Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:45 am
                                    Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Albert Silver Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:51 pm
                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Robert Hyatt Sun Jun 13, 2010 11:58 pm
                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Ben Stoker Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:50 pm
            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Eastendboy Sun Jun 13, 2010 6:18 pm
      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich clare marie benedicto Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:08 pm
      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Zach Wegner Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:01 pm
            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich K I Hyams Sun Jun 13, 2010 6:16 pm
                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Sven Schüle Sun Jun 13, 2010 6:41 pm
                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Charles Daniel Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:32 pm
                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich K I Hyams Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:41 pm
                              Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Robert Hyatt Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:15 pm
                                    Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Tom Giampietro Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:24 am
                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Roger Brown Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:22 am
                                                Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Robert Hyatt Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:58 am
                                                      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich clare marie benedicto Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:52 pm
                                                            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich S.Taylor Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:00 pm
                                                                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich kostas oreopoulos Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:26 pm
                                                                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Dann Corbit Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:30 pm
                                                                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Roger Brown Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:30 pm
                                                                              Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich kostas oreopoulos Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:56 pm
                                                                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Albert Silver Mon Jun 14, 2010 2:35 pm
                              Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Sven Schüle Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:17 pm
                                    Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Robert Hyatt Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:09 am
                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Sven Schüle Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:46 pm
                                                Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Robert Hyatt Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:05 pm
                                                      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Sven Schüle Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:18 pm
                                                            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Robert Hyatt Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:31 pm
                                                            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Zach Wegner Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:51 pm
                                                                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Dann Corbit Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:23 pm
                                                                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Rolf Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:16 pm
                                                                              Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Ben Stoker Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:23 pm
                                                                                    Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Peter C Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:00 pm
                                                                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Harvey Williamson Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:05 pm
                                                                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Christopher Conkie Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:46 pm
                                                                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Milos Stanisavljevic Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:59 pm
                                                                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Christopher Conkie Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:26 am
                                                                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Milos Stanisavljevic Wed Jun 16, 2010 2:01 am
                                                                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Christopher Conkie Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:28 am
                              Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Peter C Sun Jun 13, 2010 11:53 pm
            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Ryan Benitez Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:47 am
                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Rolf Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:04 pm
      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Djordje Vidanovic Sun Jun 13, 2010 6:05 pm
      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Roger Brown Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:40 pm
            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Alexander Schmidt Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:47 am
      Some personal attacks removed Graham Banks Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:43 pm
      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Alexander Schmidt Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:52 am
            Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Sven Schüle Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:08 am
                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Krzych Cybulsky Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:33 pm
                  Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Alexander Schmidt Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:16 pm
                        Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Steve B Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:42 pm
                              Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Roger Brown Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:00 pm
                                    Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Steve B Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:06 pm
                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Roger Brown Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:33 pm
                              Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Alexander Schmidt Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:33 pm
                                    Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Steve B Mon Jun 14, 2010 6:14 pm
                                          Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Robert Hyatt Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:32 pm
      Re: My recent correspondence with Vasik Rajlich Ingo Bauer Wed Jun 23, 2010 4:43 pm
Post new topic    TalkChess.com Forum Index -> Computer Chess Club: General Topics

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Enhanced with Moby Threads