| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ralph Stoesser
Joined: 06 Mar 2010 Posts: 294
|
Post subject: Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 11:27 pm |
|
|
| Eelco de Groot wrote: |
| Also from the top of my head elsewhere in the code when we have two bishops it is assumed these are opposite coloured bishops. It is commented that it would be better to do an explicit check because one or more of these bishops might be underpromoted, so they could be of the same colour. |
You probably meant this code?
endgame.cpp, line 120
| Code: |
if ( pos.piece_count(strongerSide, QUEEN) > 0
|| pos.piece_count(strongerSide, ROOK) > 0
|| pos.piece_count(strongerSide, BISHOP) > 1)
// TODO: check for two equal-colored bishops!
result += VALUE_KNOWN_WIN;
|
Maybe it's worth to fix it someday, although highly unlikely to occur.
Btw: From watching games I think Stockfish's bishop eval is not the best. There is no "bad bishop" evaluation. I've tried to penalize positions with blocked pawns of the same square color as the bishop's square color, but there was very little Elo improvement, if any. So meanwhile I'm convinced that it's not that easy to improve this fish! But it's fun to try so, anyway. Because the code base looks very clean and it is mostly sophisticatedly documented. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 05, 2010 4:39 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Wed May 05, 2010 4:48 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 05, 2010 5:37 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Wed May 05, 2010 5:47 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Jan Brouwer |
Wed May 05, 2010 5:49 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Wed May 05, 2010 7:25 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 05, 2010 8:02 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Wed May 05, 2010 10:10 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Wed May 05, 2010 10:30 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Wed May 05, 2010 10:47 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 05, 2010 11:27 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Thu May 06, 2010 1:23 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Thu May 06, 2010 9:07 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Sven Schüle |
Thu May 06, 2010 9:31 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Thu May 06, 2010 9:52 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Sven Schüle |
Thu May 06, 2010 10:48 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Thu May 06, 2010 12:08 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Tord Romstad |
Thu May 06, 2010 8:24 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Thu May 06, 2010 1:19 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Fri May 07, 2010 9:34 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Sat May 08, 2010 12:48 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Sat May 08, 2010 1:47 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marcel van Kervinck |
Sat May 08, 2010 2:01 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Thu May 06, 2010 11:40 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Wed May 05, 2010 10:42 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Joona Kiiski |
Wed May 05, 2010 7:54 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 05, 2010 8:28 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Larry Kaufman |
Sun May 27, 2012 7:31 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Tord Romstad |
Thu May 06, 2010 8:16 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
James Coit |
Thu May 06, 2010 10:13 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vratko Polák |
Thu May 06, 2010 11:38 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Fri May 07, 2010 12:15 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Fri May 07, 2010 5:39 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Fri May 07, 2010 8:09 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Fri May 07, 2010 8:25 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Sven Schüle |
Fri May 07, 2010 9:48 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Sven Schüle |
Fri May 07, 2010 10:31 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Fri May 07, 2010 10:54 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Miguel A. Ballicora |
Fri May 07, 2010 10:31 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sat May 08, 2010 1:33 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Sat May 08, 2010 2:29 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sat May 08, 2010 4:24 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sat May 08, 2010 7:54 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sun May 09, 2010 3:19 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Sun May 09, 2010 4:47 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sun May 09, 2010 7:51 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Sun May 09, 2010 10:47 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sun May 09, 2010 11:22 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Mon May 10, 2010 4:58 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Sven Schüle |
Mon May 10, 2010 7:39 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Mon May 10, 2010 10:22 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Mon May 10, 2010 5:04 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Mon May 10, 2010 9:35 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Tue May 11, 2010 11:19 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Tue May 11, 2010 1:51 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Tue May 11, 2010 9:38 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Wed May 12, 2010 5:05 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Robert Hyatt |
Wed May 12, 2010 6:14 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Wed May 12, 2010 6:39 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Thu May 13, 2010 12:51 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 12, 2010 8:13 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 12, 2010 9:15 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Marco Costalba |
Wed May 12, 2010 9:34 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Wed May 12, 2010 10:02 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Sat May 08, 2010 4:53 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ralph Stoesser |
Sat May 08, 2010 7:03 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:10 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:24 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
grzegorzs |
Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:36 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Dann Corbit |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:43 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:43 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:44 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Joona Kiiski |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:55 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:30 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:30 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:11 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:31 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:57 pm |
Crazy talk |
Ben-Hur Carlos Langoni |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:07 pm |
Re: Crazy talk |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:36 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ben Stoker |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:07 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:54 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Robert Hyatt |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:27 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Dann Corbit |
Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:30 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Wylie Garvin |
Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:00 pm |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Tu Ngoc Trung |
Sun May 27, 2012 2:22 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Ferdinand Mosca |
Sun May 27, 2012 10:01 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Tu Ngoc Trung |
Mon May 28, 2012 3:19 am |
Re: Stockfish - material balance/imbalance evaluation |
Eelco de Groot |
Mon May 28, 2012 4:19 am |