Why not let Norman return to chess community

[Harvey Williamson]

I don't have Fritz installed. As I told you I don't like spyware on my PC.
So this is a LIE ! I don't wonder anything about people from ChessBase.

Your ceahting detection is a joke, the software itself doen't know anything about the rules of chess.



Michael
http://www.playwitharena.com

i guess your ip address was cloned then CaptainP.

[Guenther]

"Do you at least know who Norm is, the cloner archbishop and seller of such illegal drogues. Note, he stole money from the people because his clones should not be paid or sold at all" (sorry but i haven't got the hang of this thread business yet).

well, maybe this man is a crook (as you say) and maybe he isnt. but as you seem to have the right to call him a crook he should have the right to defend himself, crook or not. even the most vile murderers are entitled to a trial, that is how things are done in the free world, and as long as ppl have the right to accuse the accused should have the right to defend themselves. so the reasons you give for not allowing him a voice, viz. that he is a crook is precisely the reason why he should be able to. and genarrly i like to make my own up and not have it made up for me by those who have already made theirs. you think him a crook, very good, but i like to see the facts for myself first and not blindly accept what you, or anyone else (including norman) teels me.

You misunderstood. That Norm sold always new clones is not to be proven to every new member. No new member is allowed to call it an unproven allegation until he, the newbie, has not been shown the facts of the case. And until that moment Norm should be innocent.

This sort of twisted logic is unacceptable. The facts are known to experts here and not even I like many have not these facts.

But therefore in recursive logic Norm cannot become innocent again. Because if he could, he would remain innocent for the rest of his life. Proof: I have many grandmothers who never have seen the facts about Norm, so that it's impossible to accuse Norm of any wrongdoings.

1. Norman did not kill anyone.
2. He sold a few examples of his clone, but he gave all that money back when accusations arose.
3. He was pnished so far by 7 months banning after starting another clone that he offered for free.

Now tell me: when Vas will give back a part of his money, corresponding to the copied code of Fruit engine?

There are already a lot of proves about his cloning activities.

1. What money did you pay for Rybka 1?
2. How do you know all people received their money back from the
Kranium entity, let alone one of them?
3. Show me finally some real proof that something essentially
besides the UCI interface 'might' be 'copied'
4. Why are you always engaged in all this mud wars?
5. When was your last ban?
6. Will you finally vanish and not poison this place anymore when
the Robbocase will be rested against it?
7. Why are you here anyway?
8. Why do you think almost only eastern europe people are engaged in anti Rybka hate flame whatever threads?
9. Have you ever posted a 'normal' computer chess post?
10. Do you consider yourself a part of the real Talkchess members?

Whatever, I wish we had an ignore function here... and please
when you finally vanish take the handful of your other anonymous
new fellowers with you, thanks. In all fora I know you would be just
a shortlived plague and I know the overwhelming majority thinks the
same.

[Henrik Dinesen]

Nominate me and we'll see

Maybe next time.

[Michael Diosi]

IP address ? In a city of 1 Mio people

ChessBase logic !

By the way wasn't on for at least 2 years. No CrapBase on my PC anymore.




Michael Diosi
http://www.playwitharena.com

[Guenther]

...

You cannot be serious! The essence of your post is that you developed
this entity for CCC, only because you still did not get Rybka4???

Guenther

[Michael Diosi]

So you start accusing people based on ChessBase reasoning ?
We at Arena use our own brain and won't tell anyone (like ChessBase does) that our software is reliable ...


Michael
http://www.playwitharena.com

[Harvey Williamson]

So you start accusing people without based on ChessBase reasoning ?
We at Arena use our own brain and won't tell anyone (like ChessBase does) that our software is reliable ...


Michael
http://www.playwitharena.com

I have the evidence - so I feel completely happy.

[Michael Diosi]

What evidence do you have ? Show us ?


I will show your evidence to all ChessBase customers so they can see.
I repeat I don't have CrapBase installed and didn't enter your crapy server in the last two years.

Maybe your "reliable" software is as micuch reliable as the CessBase software itself which doesn't understand the chess rules ?

Michael
http://www.playwitharena.com

[mariaclara]

nominate you..

hmmmmmmmmmmm.................

lemme ask Uncle Bob.

Nominate me and we'll see

[Harvey Williamson]

What evidence do you have ? Show us ?

Michael
http://www.playwitharena.com

as above the ip address matched your Michael Diosi nick. Nothing more i need to say.