Christopher Conkie wrote:
Having said that, it is bust beyond belief. It should be interesting to see just how many of the cloners can fix it. We did......after 3 months.
???
Just had to alter 1 number in the makefile, compiled cleanly first time
Christopher Conkie wrote:
Having said that, it is bust beyond belief. It should be interesting to see just how many of the cloners can fix it. We did......after 3 months.
???
Just had to alter 1 number in the makefile, compiled cleanly first time
Olivier Deville wrote:
I can confirm our team made an SMP x64 version of Ippolit that crushes Rybka hands down.
You lost me. Which is your team?
Also can your team provide me with this executable?
Note that i legally own Rybka 3 so there is no problem i think for what i'm asking. Perhaps this is wrong and in that case forget about what i'm asking.
Also this executable came from what code? In the Ippolit site i see only 2 files with code but i find it too small to make such an engine. Is there something i miss?
Olivier Deville wrote:
I can confirm our team made an SMP x64 version of Ippolit that crushes Rybka hands down.
You lost me. Which is your team?
Also can your team provide me with this executable?
Note that i legally own Rybka 3 so there is no problem i think for what i'm asking. Perhaps this is wrong and in that case forget about what i'm asking.
Also this executable came from what code? In the Ippolit site i see only 2 files with code but i find it too small to make such an engine. Is there something i miss?
M ANSARI wrote:There was mention of this program several times. Actually just a few days ago non other than Larry Kaufman was asking about who the perpetrators of this clone were and the post got deleted immediately. I guess they don't want to give publicity to something that was illegal.
It makes perfect sense not to give publicity to illegal clones, but the moderators here probably feel constrained by the charter. Sometimes decisions need to made outside the charter though, especially where common sense dictates.
If mention of Ippolit is deleted almost everywhere else, it seems irresponsible to allow it here. Just my opinion.
M ANSARI wrote:There was mention of this program several times. Actually just a few days ago non other than Larry Kaufman was asking about who the perpetrators of this clone were and the post got deleted immediately. I guess they don't want to give publicity to something that was illegal.
It makes perfect sense not to give publicity to illegal clones, but the moderators here probably feel constrained by the charter. Sometimes decisions need to made outside the charter though, especially where common sense dictates.
If mention of Ippolit is deleted almost everywhere else, it seems irresponsible to allow it here. Just my opinion.