| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mambofish Guest
|
Post subject: Re: An instructive problem Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:00 pm |
|
|
Hi Alessendro
Are you saying that Hamsters definitively recognises that hxg5 is a very bad move at ply 7, or does it (they?) consider it only slightly worse than Bxg4, like movei?
That's the key question I am trying to get an answer to. If it recognises at ply 7 (or even earlier) that hxg5 hxg4 Ne4 Qh5 f6 is a forced loss, then Hamsters has cracked the problem, and my only difficulty now is persuading you to part with your secrets!
Regards,
Vince |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
An instructive problem |
mambofish |
Fri May 25, 2007 6:23 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
Pradu Kannan |
Fri May 25, 2007 7:31 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
Gerd Isenberg |
Fri May 25, 2007 8:05 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sat May 26, 2007 7:19 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
mambofish |
Wed May 30, 2007 12:47 am |
Re: An instructive problem |
mambofish |
Fri May 25, 2007 8:10 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Sat May 26, 2007 7:17 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
Uri Blass |
Wed May 30, 2007 12:57 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
mambofish |
Wed May 30, 2007 3:24 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
Uri Blass |
Wed May 30, 2007 4:06 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
mambofish |
Wed May 30, 2007 9:02 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
Alessandro Scotti |
Wed May 30, 2007 9:35 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
mambofish |
Wed May 30, 2007 10:00 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
Alessandro Scotti |
Wed May 30, 2007 10:14 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
Uri Blass |
Wed May 30, 2007 9:52 pm |
Re: An instructive problem |
mambofish |
Wed May 30, 2007 10:40 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|