Engine rating to human GM

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Ferdy
Posts: 4833
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Philippines

Engine rating to human GM

Post by Ferdy »

What is the approximate rating in CCRL 40/40 or CEGT 40/20 for the human GM at 2500 fide elo?
corres
Posts: 3657
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
Location: hungary

Re: Engine rating to human GM

Post by corres »

I think that in the case of normal (3 min/move) time rating the chess power of an experienced human GM(?) with 2500 Elo equivalent to a chess engine with about 2600 Elo. The faster the game is the power of engines are higher.
BrendanJNorman
Posts: 2526
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:43 am
Full name: Brendan J Norman

Re: Engine rating to human GM

Post by BrendanJNorman »

Ferdy
Posts: 4833
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Philippines

Re: Engine rating to human GM

Post by Ferdy »

corres wrote:I think that in the case of normal (3 min/move) time rating the chess power of an experienced human GM(?) with 2500 Elo equivalent to a chess engine with about 2600 Elo. The faster the game is the power of engines are higher.
Is 2600 for CCRL 40/40 or CEGT 40/20?
Ferdy
Posts: 4833
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 3:15 pm
Location: Philippines

Re: Engine rating to human GM

Post by Ferdy »

BrendanJNorman wrote:This is interesting:

http://www.chessanalysis.ee/CCRL%20vs%20FIDE.pdf
That one is interesting.

Image
User avatar
Guenther
Posts: 4610
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:33 am
Location: Regensburg, Germany
Full name: Guenther Simon

Re: Engine rating to human GM

Post by Guenther »

Ferdy wrote:
BrendanJNorman wrote:This is interesting:

http://www.chessanalysis.ee/CCRL%20vs%20FIDE.pdf
That one is interesting.

Image
...just nonsense - file for his post in the forum.

I did it for you Ferdinand.
http://talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... ating+ccrl
https://rwbc-chess.de

trollwatch:
Talkchess nowadays is a joke - it is full of trolls/idiots/people stuck in the pleistocene > 80% of the posts fall into this category...
MikeGL
Posts: 1010
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 2:49 pm

Re: Engine rating to human GM

Post by MikeGL »

BrendanJNorman wrote:This is interesting:

http://www.chessanalysis.ee/CCRL%20vs%20FIDE.pdf
Thanks for the PDF link.
So since 2830(FIDE) of Carlsen is around 2580(CCRL) in 40/40, does this mean that the currently best human (rated at 2830) would be Ranked around 130+ in CCRL and could roughly play like the following engines:

Code: Select all

130-131 Amyan 1.72		                2590	
130-131 Pseudo 0.7c		               2590	
132     CuckooChess 1.12 32-bit	      2589	
133-134 GarboChess 3.0 64-bit	        2581	
133-134 K2 0.87			                2581	
135	  Jellyfish 1.1 64-bit	         2575	
136	  Fridolin2 64-bit 4CPU	        2573	
Above rankings taken from http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/

Fern is a genius, he claimed 2600 engines are already too strong for him.

.
corres
Posts: 3657
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
Location: hungary

Re: Engine rating to human GM

Post by corres »

CCRL 40/40, I think.
corres
Posts: 3657
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
Location: hungary

Re: Engine rating to human GM

Post by corres »

CCRL 40/40, I think.
corres
Posts: 3657
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:41 am
Location: hungary

Re: Engine rating to human GM

Post by corres »

The tables for translation of ratings between CCRL and FIDE are very delusive.
It is based on "the accuracy of play" and no the real chess power of CCRL players (chess engines) and FIDE players (humans).
"The accuracy of play" for a chess player is not correlate well to the chess power of that player.