I compare Sting only to Stockfish 211 and I am happy.velmarin wrote: But I see Sting almost 50 percent slower than the latest Stockfish.
And it's not your goal Marek, but fans always compare brute force.
Muchas gracias amigo!
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
I compare Sting only to Stockfish 211 and I am happy.velmarin wrote: But I see Sting almost 50 percent slower than the latest Stockfish.
And it's not your goal Marek, but fans always compare brute force.
Thank you for a great Engine. Waiting for the draw fortress detection.lech wrote:I compare Sting only to Stockfish 211 and I am happy.velmarin wrote: But I see Sting almost 50 percent slower than the latest Stockfish.
And it's not your goal Marek, but fans always compare brute force.
Muchas gracias amigo!
I know that I will do it. All is in my head. The problem is that my dual core machine is too sloow. I need to find a sponsor (i7).Master Om wrote: Thank you for a great Engine. Waiting for the draw fortress detection.
Any chance of an exe that works without asking for dll files?velmarin wrote:Later I'll put it on my blog,
Popcnt Intel version, and version easily.
Microsoft XP version with OLD_LOCKS.
Marek, maybe you should make an effort and move the code to the new Stockfish,
Not only for performance, even modernize .
Users can compile their machines with system BYO, example.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/t5i3trjj60c0b ... _SF_4.5.7z
Maybe I missed that detail,Graham Banks wrote:
Any chance of an exe that works without asking for dll files?
Graham.
Thanks. Works well now.velmarin wrote:Maybe I missed that detail,Graham Banks wrote:
Any chance of an exe that works without asking for dll files?
Graham.
try to xeon:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4xcs2zhdhyl4e ... 5%20x64.7z
Thanks Vincent, I think I should add some knovladge to Sting e.g.Vinvin wrote:On Wikipedia, you can find some very interesting fortress too : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortress_%28chess%29
1...Rh8 2.Kg7 Kxh8 is also remis according to 6 men EGTBlech wrote: [d]1K3kB1/8/6p1/7R/8/4b3/8/6n1 w - - bm Rh8;
1...Rh8 2.Kg7 Bh7!! 3.g5 Bf5 4.Kxh8 Bg4 fortress
It is possible (maybe) my idea (without tunning) can return ZERO in some non-draw positions, but I made many to drop it in next depths.
Thanks Graham, I will take a look at this problem. Perhaps it is a problem with my code. In my testes (32-bit) I found nothing wrong. The code of Stockfish 211 gives many problems for my ideas.Graham Banks wrote:Debug files here:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... p?id=32176
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... p?id=32175