| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Don Dailey
Joined: 29 Apr 2008 Posts: 4322
|
Post subject: Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:35 pm |
|
|
| Uri Blass wrote: |
| Don wrote: |
It's doesn't HAVE to become superior, but if it is gaining more ELO per doubling that Houdni, then the logicial conclusion is that it WILL overtake it. A less logical conclusion is that it will suddenly stop improving faster than Houdini, but you should at least present some rationale for thinking that is likely to happen.
|
I disagree about the following:
"if it is gaining more ELO per doubling that Houdni, then the logicial conclusion is that it WILL overtake it."
One example may be enough to prove that the conclusion is wrong and
I guess that houdini 32 bits gain more ELO per doubling than houdini 64 bits because of diminishing returns but houdini 32 bits is not going to overtake houdini 64 bits at long time control.
|
That's true, but I am assuming that you are talking about 2 programs that are already in the same general strength category which make the effect you are speaking about a minor thing. You would not expect Houdini 32 to gain 20 ELO every time you double the level against Houdini 64, you probably would see something like 5 ELO or less.
But you do have a valid point. I could have rated all the players in a big pool like I did in this other study here:
http://komodochess.com/pub/scale.png
This is a graph where the X-axis is time (on a logarithmic scale) and the y-axis is the ELO rating. We can make the adjustment you suggest by simply moving any given line forward or backwards in the y (time) axis to "normalize" the ELO with time adjustments.
| Quote: |
I think that you need to start with not equal time control but with time control that gives result that is close to 50%
|
I'm going to restart the study and rate the programs together instead in order to address this concern.
| Quote: |
If you find that the program that use more time earns more from doubling
in this case then it is more logical to think that it can beat the stronger program at long time control and even in this case it is not something that I feel sure about it. |
I did not mention the draw factor either. As programs get stronger there are more and more draws which could be the biggest reason we see a decline in all programs with more time. I see this as a natural consequence of the fact that as programs think longer they get a little closer to perfect play. One could imagine that if the only thing happening is that Komodo was just drawing more games we would see it asymptotically approach Houdini's strength but never quite reach it.
So I rated all the games that were NOT draws to see if Houdini's advantage was more or less constant in decisive games - and the results were very similar, Komodo continues to win more decisive games with each doubling. I'm not sure how to interpret that result or if it has any particular significance but I thought it was interesting.
Here are the 2 tables - you can see the ELO change in the oppo column:
| Code: |
All data including draws:
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 hou-00 3000.0 16.4 16.4 2000 68.1% 2865.7 21.7%
1 hou-01 3000.0 15.9 15.9 2000 63.5% 2903.0 24.5%
1 hou-02 3000.0 15.5 15.5 2000 60.8% 2925.4 28.7%
1 hou-03 3000.0 15.4 15.4 2000 57.7% 2947.2 29.7%
1 hou-04 3000.0 15.2 15.2 2000 55.8% 2960.5 32.1%
1 hou-05 3000.0 15.5 15.5 1867 54.1% 2972.9 35.4%
With draws removed:
Rank Name Elo + - games score oppo. draws
1 hou-00 3000.0 21.7 21.7 1567 73.1% 2787.9 0.0%
1 hou-01 3000.0 21.1 21.1 1510 67.9% 2839.7 0.0%
1 hou-02 3000.0 21.4 21.4 1426 65.1% 2865.7 0.0%
1 hou-03 3000.0 21.1 21.1 1407 61.0% 2902.4 0.0%
1 hou-04 3000.0 21.3 21.3 1359 58.6% 2924.6 0.0%
1 hou-05 3000.0 22.5 22.5 1202 56.2% 2945.6 0.0%
|
_________________ "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons." -Kang and Kodos |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| Subject |
Author |
Date/Time |
Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Teodoriu Catalin |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:17 pm |
Re: NUMBER 1 ENGINE ON LONG TIME CONTROLS |
Uri Blass |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:52 pm |
Re: NUMBER 1 ENGINE ON LONG TIME CONTROLS |
Teodoriu Catalin |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:02 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:01 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Lonnie Cook |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:21 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:16 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Robert Houdart |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:40 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:51 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Robert Houdart |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:13 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:29 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:30 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Tom Giampietro |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:05 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:40 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Robert Houdart |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 1:52 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Peter Skinner |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:54 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Carl Bicknell |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:57 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ben-Hur Carlos Langoni |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:22 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Carl Bicknell |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:00 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ben-Hur Carlos Langoni |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:04 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
George Speight |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:37 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:43 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Sedat Canbaz |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:54 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ben-Hur Carlos Langoni |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:17 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Sedat Canbaz |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:05 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Sedat Canbaz |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:57 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:57 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:33 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:41 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:51 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 5:34 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ricardo Barreira |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:54 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:53 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:35 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Jouni Uski |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:18 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Robert Houdart |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:26 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:50 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:56 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:04 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:22 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:31 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:48 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:52 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:11 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Milos Stanisavljevic |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:19 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:35 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 5:58 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:38 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:40 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:06 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:06 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Ignacio Garcia |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:22 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:50 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:30 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Jesús Muñoz |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:31 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:57 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:06 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Jouni Uski |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:10 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 8:31 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Bigler |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:52 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Larry Kaufman |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:58 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Bigler |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:03 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Larry Kaufman |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:46 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Terry McCracken |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:37 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Carl Bicknell |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 9:19 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Terry McCracken |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:49 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:59 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Terry McCracken |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:52 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls. |
Uri Blass |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:05 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Bram Mourik |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:01 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:30 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:37 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Bram Mourik |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:58 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 6:25 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
om prakash |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:00 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
enrico fagiuoli |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:43 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Leon Coleman |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:23 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:47 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:44 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:30 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:34 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
enrico fagiuoli |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 2:57 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:48 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
enrico fagiuoli |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:09 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:20 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:26 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Vincent Diepeveen |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:51 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:55 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:49 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:10 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:30 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 3:43 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:14 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:31 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Uri Blass |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:45 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:58 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:26 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:23 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Carl Bicknell |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:41 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:59 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:10 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Carl Bicknell |
Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:49 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:36 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Robert Flesher |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:28 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Dr.Wael Deeb |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:55 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Jon Dart |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:09 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Andrew R. Case |
Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:14 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Gabor Szots |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 2:19 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 3:21 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
om prakash |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:16 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Larry Kaufman |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:51 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
om prakash |
Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:54 pm |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
George Speight |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:42 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Jouni Uski |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:35 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Maurizio Maglio |
Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:41 am |
Re: Number 1 engine on long time controls |
Don Dailey |
Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:34 pm |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|