Where could I get my engine tested

[mathmoi]

Hi,

I just released my engine, MatMoi and I would really like it if it could get independent testing. I just registred it for WBEC-ridderkirk. Is there any other persons / group that could be interested in testing it. It's fairly "weak" engine that plays around 2250 on ICC. It run both on Windows and Linux.[/url]

[swami]

Hi,

I just released my engine, MatMoi and I would really like it if it could get independent testing. I just registred it for WBEC-ridderkirk. Is there any other persons / group that could be interested in testing it. It's fairly "weak" engine that plays around 2250 on ICC. It run both on Windows and Linux.[/url]

Carlos Pagador's Tournament
WBEC
UEL
Kirill's Tournament called KCEC
ChessWar
CCRL
CEGT

[Graham Banks]

Hi,

I just released my engine, MatMoi and I would really like it if it could get independent testing. I just registred it for WBEC-ridderkirk. Is there any other persons / group that could be interested in testing it. It's fairly "weak" engine that plays around 2250 on ICC. It run both on Windows and Linux.[/url]

Hi Mathieu,

could you please take a look at the CCRL 40/40 32-bit single-cpu list here and tell me some engines that you regard as being of similar strength?
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.l ... ons_only=1

Cheers,
Graham.

[mathmoi]

In my testing (with the 64 bits version) MatMoi is about 25-30 points weaker than Prophet and Monarch that are on the list. So I would expect the 32 bits version to be rated about 2100 on that list.

From testing of an little bit older version I can say that the current version should definitely score >50% against Heracles 0.6.16 and MicroMax.

Is this accurate enough or would you like me to do some test on my side and come back with a more accurate estimate of MatMoi's strenght?

[Graham Banks]

In my testing (with the 64 bits version) MatMoi is about 25-30 points weaker than Prophet and Monarch that are on the list. So I would expect the 32 bits version to be rated about 2100 on that list.

From testing of an little bit older version I can say that the current version should definitely score >50% against Heracles 0.6.16 and MicroMax.

Is this accurate enough or would you like me to do some test on my side and come back with a more accurate estimate of MatMoi's strenght?

Sounds good to me Mathieu. If MatMoi is stable, I'll include it in my Amateur Division 8.

Cheers,
Graham.

[Adam Hair]

Hi,

I just released my engine, MatMoi and I would really like it if it could get independent testing. I just registred it for WBEC-ridderkirk. Is there any other persons / group that could be interested in testing it. It's fairly "weak" engine that plays around 2250 on ICC. It run both on Windows and Linux.[/url]

Hi Mathieu,

I will run a gauntlet with your engine: 4'3" time Control and XP 64.

[mathmoi]

Hi Adam,

Thanks a lot. This would be a valuable test since I don't have access to a 64 bits windows machine for testing. If you meet any problem, let me know here of by email at your convenience.

[mathmoi]

Hi Graham,

Thanks, it should be stable, I played thousands of games per month for testing and it never (not lately at least) failed me. If you get any problems I would certainly like to hear about them, but you wont

Thanks again,

[Carlos777]

Hi Mathieu,

In my tournament, most of the participants are below 2000 ELO engines, although I have tested a few engines with a >2000 ELO. I am not sure if you are interested in blitz games, but I will include Matmoi in the next (and probably last) cycle of my tourney. After that I hope to run at least 2 tournaments, one with the top 20 engines and the other with the bottom 20 engines according to my rating list. So, maybe Matmoi can participate in the Top 20 too.

Regards,
Carlos

[mathmoi]

Hi Carlos,

Thanks for including MatMoi in your tournament, blitz is fine for me.