Hi there,
will be the new Protector available as JA version too?
Best
Frank
Protector 1.33 ...
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
-
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:07 am
Re: Protector 1.33 ...
I sent Jim an email about this yesterday.Frank Quisinsky wrote:Hi there,
will be the new Protector available as JA version too?
Best
Frank
Here is his reply:
Hi Martin,
I will compile new version very soon.
It's not a clone as far as I am concerned, no 'copy & paste' code that I can see.
Eval terms look Toga/Fruit based with some ideas taken from Crafty, Stockfish.
best,
Jim.
On 13/03/2010 20:37, Martin Thoresen wrote:
Hello Jim,
I can see that Protector 1.3.3 has been released.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/protector/
Any plans of compiling it?
Also, what is your thought on this engine? Enough original code not to be considered a Toga/Fruit clone?
Best Regards,
Martin Thoresen
-
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:10 pm
- Location: Murten / Morat, Switzerland
- Full name: Volker Pittlik
Re: Protector 1.33 ...
There are Linux and Windows executables for 32 and 64 bit environments in the download package at sourceforge.Frank Quisinsky wrote:Hi there,
will be the new Protector available as JA version too?
Best
Frank
vp
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Protector 1.33 ...
Thanks Volker,wasn't aware of thatVolker Pittlik wrote:There are Linux and Windows executables for 32 and 64 bit environments in the download package at sourceforge.Frank Quisinsky wrote:Hi there,
will be the new Protector available as JA version too?
Best
Frank
vp
Cheers,
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 6808
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: Gutweiler, Germany
- Full name: Frank Quisinsky
Re: Protector 1.33 ...
Hi Martin,
thanks for the information.
Hi Volker,
a little bit faster I think is the JA version.
Now available.
...
Best
Frank
thanks for the information.
Hi Volker,
a little bit faster I think is the JA version.
Now available.
...
Best
Frank
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm
Re: Protector 1.33 ...
Hello
Is there a changelog somewhere and I missed it?
I want to know if the difference between 1.3.2 and 1.3.3 is big enough to justify a new test. According to the small number change I assume there is no big change but ... I just assume ...
Thx
Ingo
Is there a changelog somewhere and I missed it?
I want to know if the difference between 1.3.2 and 1.3.3 is big enough to justify a new test. According to the small number change I assume there is no big change but ... I just assume ...
Thx
Ingo
-
- Posts: 1385
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:56 am
- Location: London, England
- Full name: Jim Ablett
Re: Protector 1.33 ...
New version 1.33 runs a lot slower - about 150k nps slower and it's not due to my compiling, so possibly some extra knowledge added that would account for the slowdown.IWB wrote:Hello
Is there a changelog somewhere and I missed it?
I want to know if the difference between 1.3.2 and 1.3.3 is big enough to justify a new test. According to the small number change I assume there is no big change but ... I just assume ...
Thx
Ingo
Jim.
-
- Posts: 1737
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Protector 1.33 ...
Hi Ingo,IWB wrote:Hello
Is there a changelog somewhere and I missed it?
I want to know if the difference between 1.3.2 and 1.3.3 is big enough to justify a new test. According to the small number change I assume there is no big change but ... I just assume ...
Thx
Ingo
Preliminar tests show this is a very good improvement over 1.3.2 version. I use the original compile.
Regards,
Carlos
-
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:06 pm
Re: Protector 1.33 ...
I notice the file size of the Jim Ablett build (protector-133-32-ja.exe) is 276 kb, while the 32-bit version at http://sourceforge.net/projects/protector is 1.98 mb. And the Denis Mendoza 32-bit build at http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?kmryr4d2iot is 1.96 mb.
Why such a huge difference? And which build is best/faster/stronger?
Why such a huge difference? And which build is best/faster/stronger?
-
- Posts: 619
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:10 pm
- Location: Murten / Morat, Switzerland
- Full name: Volker Pittlik
Re: Protector 1.33 ...
Downloading them and looking what nps the different exes reach may be an option. Even if there are differences, these must be big before they are getting noticeable in a usual number of games. A debug version would be something you will notice.David Dahlem wrote:... And which build is best/faster/stronger?
vp