Hi,
I started working on a chess engine last summer but I stopped after 2 months. Now I have come back to chess programming and I have implemented the UCI protocol in my engine. It lacks a lot of features for now, but I have been playing some games with it against other engines and I didn't have any stability problems, so I decided to make a first release.
It comes with a linux 64-bit compile and the source. I hope someone can make windows compiles. I would be grateful if someone included my engine in their rating lists.
The site to download it is: http://sites.google.com/site/sungorus/
Thanks
Sungorus 1.0
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Sungorus 1.0
Thanks Pablo and good luck
Dr.D
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:56 am
- Location: London, England
- Full name: Jim Ablett
Re: Sungorus 1.0
Sungorus 1.0 JA by Pablo Vazquez
Windows x64/win32 Intel compiler 11/10 pgo builds.
Download:
http://www.mediafire.com/?g4mngywjnjm
Hi Pablo,
A very nice first release.
Plays well & compiles for Windows with no warnings/errors at all.
Many thanks,
Jim.
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 9:05 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain
Re: Sungorus 1.0
Hi,
Thanks Wael and Jim for the kind words and for the logo. I have a question for testers. I was wondering if limited depth per move, nodes per move or time per move are common in testing. I ask this because I don't want to bloat the code.
Currently, those time controls are commented out but I have no problem in including them if someone needs them for testing.
Thanks
Thanks Wael and Jim for the kind words and for the logo. I have a question for testers. I was wondering if limited depth per move, nodes per move or time per move are common in testing. I ask this because I don't want to bloat the code.
Currently, those time controls are commented out but I have no problem in including them if someone needs them for testing.
Thanks
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 9:05 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain
Re: Sungorus 1.0
Hi Kenny,
Thanks for your mac compile.
Thanks for your mac compile.
-
- Posts: 41451
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Sungorus 1.0
Hi Pablo,Pablo Vazquez wrote:Hi,
Thanks Wael and Jim for the kind words and for the logo. I have a question for testers. I was wondering if limited depth per move, nodes per move or time per move are common in testing. I ask this because I don't want to bloat the code.
Currently, those time controls are commented out but I have no problem in including them if someone needs them for testing.
Thanks
roughly how strong do you think your engine is at this stage?
Cheers,
Graham.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
Re: Sungorus 1.0
My initial blitz test to verify it was working:
xboard: Match Sungorus 1.0 vs. Xpdnt 080927: final score 0-3-1
xboard: Match Sungorus 1.0 vs. Xpdnt 080927: final score 0-3-1
-
- Posts: 41451
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Sungorus 1.0
Thanks Kenny. Only a small number of games though. Keep me posted.krazyken wrote:My initial blitz test to verify it was working:
xboard: Match Sungorus 1.0 vs. Xpdnt 080927: final score 0-3-1
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 9:05 pm
- Location: Madrid, Spain
Re: Sungorus 1.0
Hi Graham,
I'm running a 4' + 2'' match against smash 1.0.3 at the moment. The result so far is +1 =3 -2 in favor of smash.
I'm running a 4' + 2'' match against smash 1.0.3 at the moment. The result so far is +1 =3 -2 in favor of smash.