Test position--not for God or Rybka

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

kgburcham
Posts: 2016
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:19 pm

Test position--not for God or Rybka

Post by kgburcham »

Be6

[D] 1r1qr1k1/3nppb1/b2p2p1/2pn4/8/2N1BNPB/PPQ1PP2/R3K2R w KQ -
User avatar
AdminX
Posts: 6340
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: Acworth, GA

Re: Test position--not for God or Rybka

Post by AdminX »

Analysis by Deep Fritz 11:

1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qb1 Bb7 3.Bg2 Ne5 4.Kf1 Nxf3 5.Bxf3 Bxf3 6.exf3 d5 7.a3 Nc6 8.Kg2 Qd7 9.Qc2 Nd4 10.Qa4 Qf5 11.Bf4 e5
=/+ (-0.43) Depth: 11/30 00:00:00 667kN
-/+ (-0.91) Depth: 19/39 00:00:45 298mN

1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Ne3 4.fxe3 Kxg7 5.0-0-0 Qa5 6.Rdf1 c4 7.Qd2 Kg8 8.Nd4 Bb7 9.e4
+- (2.34) Depth: 19/52 00:01:42 721mN
+- (2.24) Depth: 20/41 00:02:08 919mN

Analysis by bright-0.4a3:

1.Nxd5 Rxb2 2.Qa4 Bb5 3.Qd1 Rxe2+ 4.Qxe2 Bxe2 5.Kxe2 Bxa1 6.Rxa1
-/+ (-0.71) Depth: 6/19 00:00:00 36kN
-/+ (-1.24) Depth: 7/27 00:00:00 129kN

1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qb1 e6 3.Kf1 Nd5 4.Qc1 Qe7 5.Qc2 Nb4 6.Qa4 Nb6 7.Qb3 N6d5 8.Nxd5 Nxd5
=/+ (-0.70) Depth: 7/27 00:00:00 244kN
-/+ (-1.23) Depth: 14/48 00:00:20 94758kN

1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8 4.0-0-0 Bb7 5.Bxg7 Kxg7 6.e4 Qb6 7.Rdg1 d5 8.Qd2 dxe4
= (0.01) Depth: 14/51 00:00:39 187mN
+/- (1.36) Depth: 15/51 00:01:04 300mN

Analysis by Zappa Mexico II:

1.Bd2 e6 2.Rc1 Bb7 3.Nb5 Ne5 4.Bg2 Bc6 5.a4 Nxf3+ 6.Bxf3 Bxb5 7.axb5 Rxb5
-/+ (-0.71) Depth: 8/29 00:00:03 302kN
=/+ (-0.67) Depth: 14/46 00:00:37 69633kN

1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8 4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Ng5 Qa5 6.0-0-0 Bc4 7.Rh3 Rec8 8.Kb1 Ra8 9.b3 Bxb3 10.Qxb3
+/- (1.13) Depth: 14/47 00:01:14 144mN
+- (1.50) Depth: 16/51 00:02:55 358mN
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
ernest
Posts: 2041
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm

Re: Test position--not for God or Rybka

Post by ernest »

--not for God or Rybka

Well, God: 0 sec
Rybka: 32-bit, Core 2 Duo @3GHz, 512MB hash
Analysis by Rybka 3 32-bit:
1st try
1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qb1 Bb7 3.0-0 Bxf3 4.exf3 e6 5.Bf4 Be5 6.Bd2 d5 7.f4 Bg7 8.a4
-/+ (-0.91) Depth: 14 00:00:37 2849kN
1.Be6
=/+ (-0.68 !) Depth: 14 00:01:08 5515kN
2nd try
1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qd1 Bb7 3.0-0 Bxf3 4.exf3 Qc7 5.Qe2 e6 6.Be3 d5 7.a3
-/+ (-0.71) Depth: 13 00:00:14 1056kN
1.Be6
=/+ (-0.49 !) Depth: 13 00:00:36 2730kN
3rd try
1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qd1 Bb7 3.0-0 Ne5 4.Nxe5 Bxe5 5.Bg5 Qb6 6.a3 Na6 7.Qd2 Bc6 8.Rab1 Nc7
-/+ (-0.77) Depth: 14 00:00:19 1515kN
1.Be6
=/+ (-0.55 !) Depth: 14 00:00:45 3474kN
...................
1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4[] Nf8[] 4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Nh4 Qb6 6.Rb1 g5 7.Rg1 Kf7 8.Rxg5 Rec8 9.Ng6
+- (1.88) Depth: 14 00:04:29 18997kN
IWB
Posts: 1539
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:02 pm

Re: Test position--not for God or Rybka

Post by IWB »

ernest wrote:--not for God or Rybka

Well, God: 0 sec
Any proof for that?

Sorry but I am a bit sceptic - actualy even about the existence of an entity called "God"!

Bye
Ingo
User avatar
Eelco de Groot
Posts: 4567
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:40 am
Full name:   

Re: Test position--not for God or Rybka

Post by Eelco de Groot »

It takes Blueberry 5 minutes to solve on my Athlon. It is not that much worse than Rybka. I don't know how fast a deity would solve it, if deities live outside of time they can take ages and still produce an instantaneous answer, whenever they like, before you have thought of the question. Before God we are like children. What does the Fide handbook have to say about playing chess on astral planes? Ilyumzhinov should appoint a commission about this vacuum in the rules immediately so it can be voted on in the next general assembly whether this is allowed!

[D]1r1qr1k1/3nppb1/b2p2p1/2pn4/8/2N1BNPB/PPQ1PP2/R3K2R w KQ -

Engine: Blueberry Beta 4 DM70-II (256 MB)
by F. Letouzey, T. Gaksch, E. de Groot

1/14 0:00 +2.98 1.Nxd5 Rxb2 (3.483)

2/29 0:00 -0.79 1.Nxd5 Rxb2 2.Qc1 Rxe2+ 3.Kd1 (162.009)

3/45 0:09 -0.79 1.Nxd5 Rxb2 2.Qc1 Rxe2+ 3.Kd1 (4.874.638) 493

4/53 0:41 -2.24 1.Nxd5 Rxb2 2.Qd1 Bxe2 3.Qxe2 Rxe2+
4.Kxe2 e6 5.Bg5 Qa8 6.Nc7 Qe4+ 7.Be3 Qc4+
8.Ke1 Bc3+ 9.Nd2 (20.579.189) 491

4/53 1:14 -1.03 1.Bd2 Nxc3 2.Bxc3 Bxc3+ 3.Qxc3 Nf6
4.Ng5 e5 5.b3 Qb6 6.Qe3 Red8 (36.253.624) 485

4/53 1:45 -1.11 1.Bd2 e6 2.O-O Nxc3 3.Bxc3 Bxc3
4.bxc3 Qf6 5.a4 Kg7 6.g4 e5 7.g5 (50.815.007) 480

4/54 3:25 -1.25 1.Bd2 Nxc3 2.Bxc3 Bxc3+ 3.Qxc3 Nf6
4.Ng5 e5 5.Rb1 Qb6 6.Qf3 Kg7 7.Qe3 Qa5+
8.Kf1 Qxa2 (98.085.684) 477

4/54 3:25 -1.25 1.Bd2 Nxc3 2.Bxc3 Bxc3+ 3.Qxc3 Nf6
4.Ng5 e5 5.Rb1 Qb6 6.Qf3 Kg7 7.Qe3 Qa5+
8.Kf1 Qxa2 (98.085.684) 477

4/54 5:08 -1.05 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7
4.Qd2 Kf7 5.Ng5+ Kg8 6.Rh8+ Kxh8
7.Nf7+ Kg7 8.Nxd8 Rexd8 (148.721.276) 481

4/54 5:22 0.00 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7
4.Qd2 Kf7 5.O-O-O Bc4 6.Rh4 Bxa2
7.Nxd5 exd5 8.Qf4+ Ke6 9.Qe3+ Kf6
10.Qf4+ Ke6 (155.532.119) 481

4/54 6:51 +1.08 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7
4.Qd2 Bxe2 5.Qh6+ Kf7 6.Ng5+ Kf6
7.Nce4+ Kf5 8.Kxe2 Nf6 9.Nxf6 Kxf6
10.Qh8+ Kf5 (199.327.068) 484

4/54 6:51 +1.08 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7
4.Qd2 Bxe2 5.Qh6+ Kf7 6.Ng5+ Kf6
7.Nce4+ Kf5 8.Kxe2 Nf6 9.Nxf6 Kxf6
10.Qh8+ Kf5 (199.327.068) 484

5/54 6:59 +1.08 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7
4.Qd2 Bxe2 5.Qh6+ Kf7 6.Ng5+ Kf6
7.Nce4+ Kf5 8.Kxe2 Nf6 9.Nxf6 Kxf6
10.Qh8+ Kf5 (203.154.591) 484

6/54 6:59 +1.08 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7
4.Qd2 Bxe2 5.Qh6+ Kf7 6.Ng5+ Kf6
7.Nce4+ Kf5 8.Kxe2 Nf6 9.Nxf6 Kxf6
10.Qh8+ Kf5 (203.261.938) 484

7/55 9:58 +1.44 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8
4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.O-O-O Qa5 6.Nh4 Bb7
7.Rhg1 Rec8 8.Nxg6 Kf7 9.f5 c4 (290.019.206) 484

8/55 10:49 +1.41 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8
4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.O-O-O Qa5 6.Rdg1 Red8
7.Kb1 Kf7 8.Rh8 Bc4 (313.843.083) 482

9/55 11:14 +1.55 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8
4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Ng5 Qb6 6.O-O-O Rec8
7.Kb1 c4 8.Rdg1 Qxf2 9.Nxe6+ Kf7 (325.779.297) 483

10/55 11:26 +1.55 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8
4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Ng5 Qb6 6.O-O-O Rec8
7.Kb1 c4 8.Rdg1 Qxf2 9.Nxe6+ Kf7 (331.798.908) 483


best move: Bh3-e6 time: 13:20.031 min n/s: 485.717 CPU 100.0% n/s(1CPU): 485.717 nodes: 388.490.000
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you
are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: Test position--not for God or Rybka

Post by bob »

kgburcham wrote:Be6

[D] 1r1qr1k1/3nppb1/b2p2p1/2pn4/8/2N1BNPB/PPQ1PP2/R3K2R w KQ -
On my 8-core box:

Code: Select all

               18    57.13  -0.32   1. Bd2 e6 2. Bg2 Qb6 3. Rb1 Nxc3 4.
                                    Bxc3 Qb5 5. Rd1 Bxc3+ 6. bxc3 Qb2 7.
                                    Qd2 Nf6 8. Rh4 Qxd2+ 9. Rxd2 Rb1+ 10.
                                    Rd1 Rb2 11. c4
               18     1:20     +1   1. Be6!                           
               18     3:13     +3   1. Be6!                           
               18     4:56   2.02   1. Be6 fxe6 2. Bh6 Nf8 3. Bxg7 Ne3
                                    4. Qd2 Nf5 5. Bh8 Rb4 6. e4 <HT>
less than 1.5 minutes to find and play OTB, but almost 5 minutes to discover how good it really is...
Spock

Re: Test position--not for God or Rybka

Post by Spock »

Deep Shredder 11 on my Q6600 takes a long time to find this - nearly 13 mins:

11/29 0:01 -0.55 1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qd1 Bb7 3.Bg2 Ne5 4.Nxe5 Bxg2 5.Rh2 Bxe5 6.Rxg2 Nc6 (3.040.028) 2347
12/23 0:01 -0.55 1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qd1 Bb7 3.Bg2 Ne5 4.Nxe5 Bxg2 5.Rh2 Bxe5 6.Rxg2 Nc6 (4.625.029) 2430
13/35 0:03 -0.60 1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qd1 Bb7 3.Bg2 Ne5 4.Nxe5 Bxg2 5.Rh2 Bxe5 6.Rxg2 Nc6 7.f4 Bg7 8.Qa4 Qd7 9.Qc2 (9.199.800) 2457
14/35 0:08 -0.71 1.Bd2 Nb4 (20.686.244) 2473 SB:4
15/33 0:15 -0.47 1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qb1 Bb7 3.Bg2 Ne5 4.Nxe5 Bxg2 5.Rh2 Bxe5 6.Rxg2 Qb6 7.Rh2 Nc6 (37.812.694) 2491 SB:4
16/35 0:22 -0.49 1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qb1 Bb7 3.Bg2 Ne5 4.Nxe5 Bxg2 5.Rh2 Bxe5 6.Rxg2 Qb6 7.Rh2 Nc6 8.b3 e6 9.Qd3 d5 10.Na4 Qa7 11.Rc1 (56.471.435) 2563 SB:4
17/40 0:57 -0.82 1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qd1 Bb7 3.Bg2 Ne5 4.Nxe5 Bxg2 5.Rh2 Bb7 6.Ng4 Qd7 7.Ne3 Qe6 8.Rh4 Ra8 9.a4 Bf6 10.Rh2 Bd4 11.Rh4 g5 (150.986.998) 2616 SB:37
17/57 12:50 +2.31 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8 4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Nh4 Qb6 6.Rb1 g5 7.Rg1 Kf7 8.Rxg5 Red8 9.Ng6 Qb7 10.Nxf8 Kxf8 11.Qg6 Qh1+ 12.Rg1 Qh8 13.Rg4 (2.225.577.408) 2888 SB:4.790
18/52 14:04 +2.47 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8 4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Nh4 Qb6 6.Rb1 g5 7.Rg1 Kf7 8.Rxg5 Red8 9.Ng6 Qb7 10.Nxf8 Kxf8 11.Qg6 Qh1+ 12.Kd2 Qh8 13.Qxe6 (2.445.292.746) 2896 SB:5.182
19/55 15:45 +2.60 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8 4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Nh4 Qb6 6.Rb1 g5 7.Rg1 Kf7 8.Rxg5 Red8 9.Ng6 Qb7 10.Nxf8 Kxf8 11.Qg6 Qh1+ 12.Kd2 Qh8 13.e3 d5 14.Qxe6 (2.744.955.325) 2902 SB:6.315
best move: Bh3-e6 time: 20:09.756 min n/s: 2.921.948 CPU 398.1% n/s(1CPU): 733.973 nodes: 3.534.753.667 SB: 9.792


Naum 4 on a single CPU does pretty well - under 6 mins. On 4CPU it would presumably be faster

12/24 0:00 -0.72 1.Bd2 e6 2.Bg2 N7b6 3.b3 Nb4 4.Qb2 N6d5 5.a3 Nc6 6.e4 (864.075) 954
13/27 0:01 -0.73 1.Bd2 e6 2.Bg2 N7b6 3.b3 Bb7 4.Nxd5 exd5 5.Bg5 Qd7 6.O-O-O d4 7.Bh3 (1.790.317) 1006
14/32 0:04 -0.73 1.Bd2 e6 2.Bg2 N7b6 3.b3 Bb7 4.Rc1 Nb4 5.Qb2 Qd7 6.a3 N4d5 7.Rh4 Bf6 (5.061.776) 1028
15/34 0:09 -0.69 1.Bd2 e6 2.Bg2 N7b6 3.b3 Bb7 4.Rc1 Nb4 5.Qb2 Bf6 6.a3 N4d5 7.Qc2 Qd7 8.Ne4 (9.287.298) 1022
16/44 0:45 -0.88 1.Bd2 e6 2.Bg2 N7b6 3.b3 Nb4 4.Qc1 N6d5 5.a3 Nc6 6.Qc2 Na5 7.Rb1 Qb6 8.Na4 Qb5 (45.738.831) 1016
17/45 2:23 -0.92 1.Bd2 e6 2.Rc1 c4 3.O-O Nc5 4.Rfd1 Qd7 5.Ng5 Qe7 6.Nf3 Qd8 7.Na4 Nxa4 8.Qxa4 Bb5 9.Qc2 (141.813.326) 988
17/61 5:57 +1.87 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Ne3 4.fxe3 Kxg7 5.O-O-O Qa5 6.e4 Kg8 7.Rdf1 e5 8.Qd2 Qb4 9.a3 (363.552.381) 1017
18/57 14:07 +2.42 1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Ne3 4.fxe3 Kxg7 5.Qd2 Nd7 6.Ng5 Bc4 7.Rh4 Ne5 8.b3 Rh8 9.bxc4 Qd7 (868.664.568) 1024
best move: Bh3-e6 time: 15:33.104 min n/s: 1.024.734 nodes: 873.283.896
PauloSoare
Posts: 1335
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:30 am
Location: Cabo Frio, Brasil

Re: Test position--not for God or Rybka

Post by PauloSoare »

IWB wrote:
ernest wrote:--not for God or Rybka

Well, God: 0 sec
Any proof for that?

Sorry but I am a bit sceptic - actualy even about the existence of an entity called "God"!

Bye
Ingo
He have no proof because he is wrong. God=- infinite sec :D
You are not alone, once again we have the existential problems of our adolescence.
kgburcham
Posts: 2016
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:19 pm

compare DF1 to your DF11

Post by kgburcham »

Not too bad for an old gray haired outdated program.
This old program runs much stronger with viagra.


[D] 1r1qr1k1/3nppb1/b2p2p1/2pn4/8/2N1BNPB/PPQ1PP2/R3K2R w KQ - 0 1

Deep Fritz 1 on Q6600

1.Bd2 Bb7 2.Bg2 Nb4 3.Qd1 Ne5 4.Nh4 Nc4 5.Bxb7 Rxb7 6.b3 Ne5
= (-0.09) Depth: 11/31 00:00:02 13744kN
1.Bd2 Bb7 2.Nd1 Nb4 3.Bxb4 Bxf3 4.exf3 Rxb4 5.a3 Rb8 6.Nc3 e6
= (-0.12) Depth: 12/34 00:00:05 33247kN
1.Bd2 Bb7 2.Bg2 Nb4 3.Qd1 Ne5 4.Nxe5 Bxg2 5.Rh2 Bxe5 6.Rxg2 Ra8
= (-0.22) Depth: 13/38 00:00:17 104744kN
1.Be6!
= (-0.19) Depth: 13/38 00:00:30 183834kN
1.Be6! fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7 4.Qd2 Kf7 5.Qh6 Bxe2 6.Ng5+ Kf6
= (0.03) Depth: 13/38 00:00:44 263139kN
1.Be6--
³ (-0.28) Depth: 14/43 00:00:56 338413kN
1.Be6-- fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7 4.Qd2 Kf7 5.Qh6 Bxe2 6.Ng5+ Kf6
³ (-0.34) Depth: 14/43 00:01:12 433990kN
1.Bd2!
³ (-0.31) Depth: 14/43 00:01:19 477042kN
1.Bd2! Bb7 2.Bg2 Nb4 3.Qd1 Ne5 4.Nxe5 Bxg2 5.Rh2 Bxe5
³ (-0.28) Depth: 14/43 00:01:48 649550kN
1.Bd2 Bb7 2.Bg2 Nb4 3.Qd1 Ne5 4.Nxe5 Bxg2 5.Rh2 Bxe5 6.Rxg2 Qd7
= (-0.25) Depth: 15/41 00:04:11 1566533kN
1.Be6!
= (-0.22) Depth: 15/41 00:04:45 1772954kN
1.Be6! fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7 4.Qd2 Kf7 5.Qh6 Qa5
² (0.28) Depth: 15/45 00:06:42 2490457kN
1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7 4.Qd2 Kf7 5.Qh6 Qa5
² (0.28) Depth: 16/42 00:10:06 3788596kN
1.Be6!
² (0.59) Depth: 17/44 00:20:18 7761950kN
1.Be6! fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7 4.Qd2 Kf7 5.Qh6 Bxe2 6.Ng5+ Kf6
+- (1.72) Depth: 17/46 00:36:50 14028516kN
1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8 4.Bxg7 Kxg7
+- (1.72) Depth: 18/48 01:12:11 27469344kN
1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8 4.Bxg7 Kxg7 5.Nh4 Qb6 6.Rb1
+- (1.84) Depth: 19/48 02:43:03 62357587kN
User avatar
AdminX
Posts: 6340
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: Acworth, GA

Re: Test position--not for God or Rybka

Post by AdminX »

Analysis by Deep Junior 10.1:

1.Nxd5 Rxb2 2.Qa4 Bb5 3.Qd1 Bxe2 4.Qxe2 Rxe2+ 5.Kxe2 Bxa1 6.Rxa1
+/- (1.34) Depth: 3 00:00:00 0kN
-/+ (-0.71) Depth: 9 00:00:00 290kN

1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qd1 Nf6
=/+ (-0.43) Depth: 9 00:00:00 473kN
=/+ (-0.47) Depth: 20 00:01:22 709mN

1.Be6
= (-0.12) Depth: 20 00:04:42 1355mN
+/- (0.93) Depth: 22 00:12:31 2482mN


Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0:

1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qd1 Bb7 3.Bf4 Ne5 4.Bxe5 Bxe5 5.e4 Bf6 6.a3 Nc6 7.Bg2 Nd4 8.Nh4 Bxh4 9.Rxh4
+/= (0.30) Depth: 10 00:00:00 411kN
= (-0.18) Depth: 14 00:00:12 11197kN

1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.gxf4 Nf8 4.Ng5 Qb6 5.Rb1 Bb7 6.Rh4 Qc6 7.Kd2 Bxh6 8.Rxh6
+/= (0.32) Depth: 14 00:01:04 61360kN
+/- (1.10) Depth: 15 00:03:00 182mN


Analysis by Chess Tiger 15.0:

1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qd1 Bb7 3.Bf4 Ne5 4.Bxe5 Bxe5 5.Bg2 Bd4 6.e3 Bxc3+ 7.bxc3
+/= (0.68) Depth: 1 00:00:00 1kN
= (-0.18) Depth: 13 00:00:09 7768kN

1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf8 3.Bxg7 Kxg7 4.Qd2 Kf7 5.Qh6 Nxc3 6.Ng5+ Kf6 7.Qh8+ Kf5 8.Nf7 Qd7
+/- (0.90) Depth: 13 00:01:06 58485kN
+- (1.64) Depth: 16 00:07:57 428mN


Analysis by Chess Tiger 2007:

1.Bd2 Nb4 2.Qd1 Bb7 3.Bg2 Ne5 4.Bc1 Nxf3+ 5.Bxf3 Qd7 6.a3 Ra8 7.Bg5 Bxf3 8.exf3
+/= (0.68) Depth: 6 00:00:02 9kN
=/+ (-0.38) Depth: 19 00:00:27 32635kN

1.Be6 fxe6 2.Bh6 Nf4 3.Bxf4 Qb6 4.Rb1 Qb4 5.Rh4 Bxc3+ 6.Bd2 Bxd2+ 7.Nxd2 Bd3 8.exd3 Qb5 9.d4 Kg7 10.Qe4
+/= (0.54) Depth: 19 00:02:19 185mN
+/- (0.98) Depth: 22 00:05:07 415mN
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers