Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
I was wondering what it's ratings is? This seems to be the perfect engine to play against. Although It is stronger then me, I feel that it is beatable and it's a pleasure to play against. It makes positional errors and slight tactical errors, not gross blunders like the chessmaster personalities. It is much like a human player. The person who reccomended it says it's between 2000-2200 elo, I'd like to verify this.
-
- Posts: 27809
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
It is at the bottom of the CCRL rating list:
It is a good sparring partner for my 100-line engine micro-Max.
Code: Select all
100 Feuerstein 0.4.5.1 2177 +40 −41 46.4% +27.2 22.5% 222
101 BigLion 2.23w 2154 +40 −40 48.1% +14.2 22.3% 233
102 Monarch 1.7 2150 +35 −36 35.8% +124.5 20.9% 335
Smash 1.0.3 2063 +48 −49 34.2% +123.3 17.0% 171
103 Marvin 1.3.0 2061 +42 −44 32.2% +133.7 22.4% 214
104 Clueless 1.4 2033 +41 −42 36.5% +105.8 17.4% 219
105 Micro-Max 4.8 2024 +38 −39 33.8% +121.2 23.3% 253
Re: Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
I dont have as many games as CCRL but it is rated way lower...Ranked 158, the huge variation in rating could be due to Elostat messing up the rating of weaker engines.
Code: Select all
148 Clueless 1.3b : 1928 78 76 77 64.3 % 1826 11.7 %
149 BigLion 2.23w : 1924 71 69 94 64.4 % 1821 9.6 %
150 Laurifer 1.0 : 1921 77 75 78 63.5 % 1825 11.5 %
151 BBChess 0.99b : 1920 75 74 82 62.2 % 1834 9.8 %
152 IACH 0.56E : 1919 72 71 84 61.9 % 1834 14.3 %
153 Ssechess 2.05DC : 1918 77 76 78 62.8 % 1827 10.3 %
154 Alf 1.06 : 1914 73 72 83 60.2 % 1842 12.0 %
155 Gerbil 02 : 1912 74 72 80 62.5 % 1823 15.0 %
156 ChessAlex 1.4 r 3 : 1902 81 79 70 59.3 % 1837 10.0 %
157 FireFly 2.13 : 1894 73 72 78 59.6 % 1827 16.7 %
158 Smash 1.03 : 1891 69 68 83 57.8 % 1836 19.3 %
159 Gibbon 2.01b : 1889 75 74 73 56.2 % 1846 16.4 %
160 Feuerstein 0.4.5 beta 1 : 1872 74 73 73 55.5 % 1834 17.8 %
161 Warrior 1.0.3 : 1869 76 76 71 55.6 % 1829 15.5 %
162 Mustang 3.0 : 1863 75 75 70 55.0 % 1828 18.6 %
163 Marvin 1.3.0 : 1848 73 73 79 53.2 % 1826 12.7 %
164 FreeChess 2.16e : 1832 72 72 77 50.6 % 1827 15.6 %
165 Enigma 1.1.4 : 1805 75 75 77 46.8 % 1828 10.4 %
166 Alex 1.78 : 1805 70 71 86 45.3 % 1837 11.6 %
167 Rival 1.14 : 1800 82 83 70 46.4 % 1824 1.4 %
168 Eagle 0.7.5 : 1791 79 80 71 44.4 % 1830 7.0 %
169 Amundsen 0.55 : 1769 74 75 78 41.7 % 1827 11.5 %
170 Adamant 1.7 : 1764 76 77 77 40.9 % 1828 9.1 %
171 J.S.BAM 0.52 : 1755 74 75 78 39.7 % 1827 12.8 %
172 Kanguruh 1.92 : 1745 80 83 71 36.6 % 1841 8.5 %
-
- Posts: 27809
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
The rating list of CCRL is compressed nearly 20% compared to, for example, WBEC. It might indeed be a difference between different rating extraction methods. As most lists calibrate on the top engines, weak engines are usually rated higher at CCRL.
On the other hand, I did run micro-Max at ICC for a week, playing many blitz (5') and normal (20') games. For both these classes it obtained a rating of 2260 at the end.
It was much in demand, because indeed it seemed beatable, and occasionally lost a game. Opponents that played it kept coming back.
On the other hand, I did run micro-Max at ICC for a week, playing many blitz (5') and normal (20') games. For both these classes it obtained a rating of 2260 at the end.
It was much in demand, because indeed it seemed beatable, and occasionally lost a game. Opponents that played it kept coming back.
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
Hi,
Smash is in my amateur section in my rating list,the lowest division....
this is after playing 68 games at long time controls and btw it's an MP version
_Amateur Section
Simon 1.0 i 1872_3/60
Gringo 1.4.7m 1867_3/60
Mscp 1.6g 1868_3/60
Marquis 0.1.5 1865_3/60
Rainman 0.7.5 1865_3/60
Mint 2.3 1864_3/60
TJchess 078R2 1862_3/60
Soldat 0.25b i 1839_31,5/112
Smash 1.0.3 MP i 1835_3/68
Nero 6.1 1834_7/52
TSCP 1.81Cr n 1830_17/76
SEE 0.6.7 i 1822_3/60
Warrior 1.0.3 1820_3/60
Roque 1.1 i 1804_2/60
Cassandre 0.24 i 1766_4,5/48
T-rex 1.8.5 i 1760_4/48
Fause 0.32 1759_17/84
BACE 0.46 1746_13/84
BremboCE 0.4 1710_13,5/76
Tamerlane 0.2 i 1702_1/60
Yawce 0.16 i 1702_1/60
Zephyr 0.61 1702_1/60
Mooboo 0.04E i 1701_10/84
Stan's Chess 1.42 1678_1/60
Cefap 0.72 1672_8,5/68
Smash is in my amateur section in my rating list,the lowest division....
this is after playing 68 games at long time controls and btw it's an MP version
_Amateur Section
Simon 1.0 i 1872_3/60
Gringo 1.4.7m 1867_3/60
Mscp 1.6g 1868_3/60
Marquis 0.1.5 1865_3/60
Rainman 0.7.5 1865_3/60
Mint 2.3 1864_3/60
TJchess 078R2 1862_3/60
Soldat 0.25b i 1839_31,5/112
Smash 1.0.3 MP i 1835_3/68
Nero 6.1 1834_7/52
TSCP 1.81Cr n 1830_17/76
SEE 0.6.7 i 1822_3/60
Warrior 1.0.3 1820_3/60
Roque 1.1 i 1804_2/60
Cassandre 0.24 i 1766_4,5/48
T-rex 1.8.5 i 1760_4/48
Fause 0.32 1759_17/84
BACE 0.46 1746_13/84
BremboCE 0.4 1710_13,5/76
Tamerlane 0.2 i 1702_1/60
Yawce 0.16 i 1702_1/60
Zephyr 0.61 1702_1/60
Mooboo 0.04E i 1701_10/84
Stan's Chess 1.42 1678_1/60
Cefap 0.72 1672_8,5/68
Last edited by Dr.Wael Deeb on Thu Dec 27, 2007 7:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
The latest smash version plays around 1800 Elo and I can confirm this fact from the games I've played against it,I can beat it easily in a 10 games matchhgm wrote:The rating list of CCRL is compressed nearly 20% compared to, for example, WBEC. It might indeed be a difference between different rating extraction methods. As most lists calibrate on the top engines, weak engines are usually rated higher at CCRL.
On the other hand, I did run micro-Max at ICC for a week, playing many blitz (5') and normal (20') games. For both these classes it obtained a rating of 2260 at the end.
It was much in demand, because indeed it seemed beatable, and occasionally lost a game. Opponents that played it kept coming back.
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
- Posts: 27809
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
That might not mean a whole lot, as you are only a single opponent, and be especially experienced in dealing with computers.
I am not sure what all the numbers in your rating list mean, but if you group Smash with the other engines mentioned there, I think something must be wrong with the way you installed it. It is really incomparably stronger than most of those. The current version of micro-Max scores nearly 50% against it. And I have tested uMax against many of the engines on your list, during its development, and at the end it totally crushed most of them, to the extent that I had to replace them from the standard gauntlett, because playing them was basically a waste of time (contributing more to the noise than to the rating).
I am not sure what all the numbers in your rating list mean, but if you group Smash with the other engines mentioned there, I think something must be wrong with the way you installed it. It is really incomparably stronger than most of those. The current version of micro-Max scores nearly 50% against it. And I have tested uMax against many of the engines on your list, during its development, and at the end it totally crushed most of them, to the extent that I had to replace them from the standard gauntlett, because playing them was basically a waste of time (contributing more to the noise than to the rating).
Re: Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
The latest smash version plays around 1800 Elo and I can confirm this fact from the games I've played against it,I can beat it easily in a 10 games match
Sorry Dr. Weeb
But I find this very hard to believe, I'm rated 2032 fide and played two serious games with Smash and I lost both games 40moves 1hour.
Also I'm trying to rate it against several chessmaster 10 personalities and after 6 games it has a rating of 2180, I don't know of any MP version I'm using the single version, but it is by no means 1800elo.
Sorry Dr. Weeb
But I find this very hard to believe, I'm rated 2032 fide and played two serious games with Smash and I lost both games 40moves 1hour.
Also I'm trying to rate it against several chessmaster 10 personalities and after 6 games it has a rating of 2180, I don't know of any MP version I'm using the single version, but it is by no means 1800elo.
-
- Posts: 27809
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Amsterdam
- Full name: H G Muller
Re: Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
If you are interested playing engines in that Elo range, you could also conside micro-Max, the World's smallest chess program, measuring less than 2000 characters of computer code...
Re: Has anyone ever heard of an engine called Smash?
Also you have very good and very fast moves generator.hgm wrote:If you are interested playing engines in that Elo range, you could also conside micro-Max, the World's smallest chess program, measuring less than 2000 characters of computer code...
thanks.