Surprise, DanaSah is 3 ply or more deep and she gains quite easy the match. On the basis of this result it could consider the ELO of Fruit 2.3.1 in the PPC in 2200 - 2300, which is a deception.
Code: Select all
DanaSah v3.03 111½1101½½ 7.5/10
Fruit 2.3.1 v 000½0010½½ 2.5/10
Following the advice of Tony I use the book performance.bin and repeat the test. The result is similar but I would say that Fruit play better.
Code: Select all
DanaSah v3.03 0111½011½1 7.0/10
Fruit 2.3.1 p 1000½100½0 3.0/10
I decide to use last version of my program, DanaSah 3.13. Also I use Toga 1.2.1a (I create remember only 5 points less of ELO in CCRL 40/40 that Fruit 2.3.1). In Pocket PC in matches that have made other people Toga 1.2.1a has been able to defeat to Pocket Fritz2 or Hiarcs 9.6a.
But if DanaSah 3.03 wins easily to Fruit 2.3.1, version 3.13 would have to do it more easily to Toga 1.2.1a. But another surprise arrives here, Toga and DanaSah are tremendously even and the match is decided by the minim.
Code: Select all
Toga 1.2.1a ½10½0½1011 5.5/10
DanaSah v3.13 ½01½1½0100 4.5/10
I want to prove if Toga and Fruit have an equal level and by the result it seems that yes.
Code: Select all
Fruit 2.3.1 ½½1½½01½10 5.5/10
DanaSah v3.13 ½½0½½10½01 4.5/10
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wich it is the good value, 2200-2300 of first time or 2500-2600 of second?
Perhaps this has a little explanation, DanaSah 3.13 has more knowledge (evaluation) that version 3.03 and is perhaps a slower 40% in my computer. Still it continues being deeper but instead of 3 plys for example 2, perhaps danasah 3.03 in this case is superior by search.
You can download the games here http://danasah.googlepages.com/danapc-fruitppc.pgn
Best,
Pedro