Stockfish DD x64 @ CEGT 5'+3" pb=on

[ouachita]

so confusing that someone needs to setup a tournament including ALL of the various SF dev. versions to determine which is the strongest while recognizing that numerous additional versions will be issued during the tournament rendering it useless.

[ThatsIt]

Update after 450 games.

http://cegt.forumieren.com/t43-testing-stockfish-dd-x64

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

[ThatsIt]

Update after 650 games.

http://cegt.forumieren.com/t43-testing-stockfish-dd-x64

+ 58 over Stockfish 4.0,
only 44 points behind Houdini 4.0 so far.

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

[ThatsIt]

Update after 900 games.

http://cegt.forumieren.com/t43-testing-stockfish-dd-x64

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

[ThatsIt]

Update after 1200 games.

http://cegt.forumieren.com/t43-testing-stockfish-dd-x64

Best wishes,
G.S.
(CEGT team)

[ouachita]

Gerald,
Am I interpreting your results correctly? Versus Houdini 4.0 x64, SF DD has scored 24.0-26.0 with ELO of 3103 versus H4 ELO 3117?

[ThatsIt]

Gerald,
Am I interpreting your results correctly? Versus Houdini 4.0 x64, SF DD has scored 24.0-26.0 with ELO of 3103 versus H4 ELO 3117?

Houdini has 3117, Stockfish DD scored 48% = -14.
3117 - 14 = 3103 and thats the performance of Stockfish DD
out of this match only of course !

The total performance of Stockfish DD is 3070 so far.

Best wishes,
G.S.

[ouachita]

thanks. Perhaps we can agree that such tests will continue ad infinitum until everyone involved gets the answers they seek.