| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Terry McCracken

Joined: 01 Aug 2007 Posts: 10832 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 2:02 pm Post subject: Sequoia Supercomputer Towers above the Rest |
|
|
http://www.top500.org/lists/2012/06/press-release
MANNHEIM, Germany; BERKELEY, Calif.; and KNOXVILLE, Tenn.—For the first time since November 2009, a United States supercomputer sits atop the TOP500 list of the world’s top supercomputers. Named Sequoia, the IBM BlueGene/Q system installed at the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory achieved an impressive 16.32 petaflop/s on the Linpack benchmark using 1,572,864 cores. _________________ Terry McCracken |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dr.Wael Deeb

Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 8650 Location: Amman,Jordan
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:45 pm Post subject: Re: Sequoia Supercomputer Towers above the Rest |
|
|
| Terry McCracken wrote: |
http://www.top500.org/lists/2012/06/press-release
MANNHEIM, Germany; BERKELEY, Calif.; and KNOXVILLE, Tenn.—For the first time since November 2009, a United States supercomputer sits atop the TOP500 list of the world’s top supercomputers. Named Sequoia, the IBM BlueGene/Q system installed at the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory achieved an impressive 16.32 petaflop/s on the Linpack benchmark using 1,572,864 cores. |
Wow  _________________ It ain't about how hard you can hit,it's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward,how much you can take and keep moving forward. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Matthew R. Brades
Joined: 17 Jul 2011 Posts: 800
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:47 pm Post subject: Re: Sequoia Supercomputer Towers above the Rest |
|
|
Now we just have to get Stockfish running on it.
Rybka Cluster eat my dust.
Matthew:out _________________ Well, that's that.
Account. Gone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daniel Shawul
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 2285 Location: Ethiopia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:03 pm Post subject: Re: Sequoia Supercomputer Towers above the Rest |
|
|
Question is how long will it stay there ? I read somewhere in a few years we will be seeing a scale of whatever is next to petaflop, with a hybrid approach of cpu-gpu-fpga. _________________ https://sites.google.com/site/dshawul/
https://github.com/dshawul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Martin Thoresen

Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 1561
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:14 pm Post subject: Re: Sequoia Supercomputer Towers above the Rest |
|
|
| Daniel Shawul wrote: |
| Question is how long will it stay there ? I read somewhere in a few years we will be seeing a scale of whatever is next to petaflop, with a hybrid approach of cpu-gpu-fpga. |
Exa.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exa- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daniel Shawul
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 2285 Location: Ethiopia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:40 pm Post subject: Re: Sequoia Supercomputer Towers above the Rest |
|
|
Prediction Exa in 2018, Zetta in 2028, Yotta in 2038.
Implications of exa scale computing: Simulation of a human brain! (rat's brain before that), 2 weaks weather prediction (this time for real )
cheers _________________ https://sites.google.com/site/dshawul/
https://github.com/dshawul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Julien MARCEL

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 2291 Location: Nantes (France)
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Sequoia Supercomputer Towers above the Rest |
|
|
I had a very weird and off topic thought, reading this article: my first thought was "wow, this thing must cost in one second the amount of electricity I would use in one year!"  _________________ "A witty quote proves nothing." (Voltaire)
Author of Prédateur chess engine: http://predateur-chess.blogspot.fr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jef Kaan
Joined: 25 Jul 2010 Posts: 100 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 12:52 am Post subject: Re: Sequoia Supercomputer Towers above the Rest |
|
|
[quote="Daniel Shawul"] Simulation of a human brain!
cheers[/quote]
well i guess it will depend on whose brain they are going to simulate.
and maybe they finally can show chess is a draw ?
ah well otherwise i got another chess variant, as Fischer random
doesnt seem to be so popular: 'alternative chess',
we simply exchange the location of king and queen,
so king on d1. And you need another opening book.
oh and btw, its no fair i think White always starts,
so in alternative chess we let Black start.
And why should a1 be on the left corner of the White side?
In alternative chess it should be on the left corner of the Black side.
oh and btw then maybe this exa computer can show
1.d4 will be the best move .. _________________ jefk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daniel Shawul
Joined: 14 Mar 2006 Posts: 2285 Location: Ethiopia
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:14 am Post subject: Re: Sequoia Supercomputer Towers above the Rest |
|
|
Turns out article I read is quite old. Rat's and Cat's brain have been solved.
A joke happened to me:
Question: What to do with Zeta flops in 2028?
Dumb(?) Guy: Simulate a 1000 brains ... an Einestein.
You can guess when my brain was/will be solved from this attempt of a joke
Note that most are tested on LINPACK so we can't use its full power for chess. Plus solving it is not of the utmost importance to many (cancer,natural catastrophes and probably war.. are top priority). Nothing happened after checkers got solved..people still play it anyway. Also we know e4! don't loose.
Oh and btw I think your writing style sucks  _________________ https://sites.google.com/site/dshawul/
https://github.com/dshawul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jef Kaan
Joined: 25 Jul 2010 Posts: 100 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2012 1:30 am Post subject: Re: Sequoia Supercomputer Towers above the Rest |
|
|
[quote="Daniel Shawul"]Turns out article I read is quite old. Rat's and Cat's brain have been solved.
the neurons maybe, but not consciousness.
cmputers are deterministic, a humans brain is not.
at least mine is not or at least i believe its not.
irrespective of my writing style.
which i learned from Blik(C) btw on ICC _________________ jefk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|