I really like how Stockfish plays the kingside attackNathanael Russell wrote:I really like how Komodo 9.2 64-bit plays positionally.
Stockfish vs Komodo 9.2(ct=0)
Moderator: Ras
-
beram
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm
Re: Stockfish vs Komodo 9.2(ct=0)
-
beram
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm
Re: Stockfish vs Komodo 9.2(ct=0)
I am pro attacking and entertaining chessJJJ wrote:Aren't you pro Stockfish Bram ?
Stockfish wins are more often entertaining
But I can admire nice wins from Komodo
I give now two wins from last match where Komodo with black pieces plays brilliantly
[pgn]
[Event "SF 251015 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 6m+4"]
[Site "AMD X6 1090T 3200 Mhz (Fritzm"]
[Date "2015.10.30"]
[Round "21"]
[White "Stockfish 251015 64"]
[Black "Komodo 9.2 64-bit"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B80"]
[Annotator "0.25;0.18"]
[PlyCount "100"]
[TimeControl "360+4"]
{AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor 3207 MHz W=22.7 plies; 5.334kN/s B=23.
1 plies; 5.158kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. g3 Nc6 4. Bg2 Nf6 5. Nc3 d6 6. O-O
Be7 7. d4 cxd4 8. Nxd4 Bd7 {Both last book move} 9. Nxc6 {[%eval 25,23] [%emt
0:00:16]} bxc6 {[%eval 18,21] [%emt 0:00:09] (Bxc6)} 10. Na4 {[%eval 13,23]
[%emt 0:00:19] (Qe2)} h5 {[%eval 12,22] [%emt 0:00:29] (0-0)} 11. c4 {[%eval
18,22] [%emt 0:00:26]} h4 {[%eval 2,23] [%emt 0:00:14]} 12. Bg5 {[%eval 21,23]
[%emt 0:00:10] (c5)} hxg3 {[%eval 0,23] [%emt 0:00:32]} 13. fxg3 {[%eval 20,19]
[%emt 0:00:01] (hxg3)} Qc7 {[%eval 3,23] [%emt 0:00:16]} 14. b3 {[%eval 24,22]
[%emt 0:00:07]} e5 {[%eval 0,23] [%emt 0:00:15]} 15. h4 {[%eval 21,23] [%emt 0:
00:13]} Be6 {[%eval 0,24] [%emt 0:00:07] (Rd8)} 16. Bd2 {[%eval 4,22] [%emt 0:
00:26] (Rc1)} O-O {[%eval -10,22] [%emt 0:00:12]} 17. Rc1 {[%eval 0,24] [%emt
0:00:17]} Qd7 {[%eval -12,24] [%emt 0:00:16]} 18. Qe2 {[%eval 0,23] [%emt 0:00:
07]} Bg4 {[%eval -7,23] [%emt 0:00:10] (Rad8)} 19. Qd3 {[%eval 0,23] [%emt 0:
00:07] (Qf2)} Rad8 {[%eval -11,22] [%emt 0:00:19]} 20. Rce1 {[%eval 0,26]
[%emt 0:00:07]} Qe6 {[%eval -14,23] [%emt 0:00:26] (Rb8)} 21. Qe3 {[%eval 0,25]
[%emt 0:00:13] (Ba5)} Bh3 {[%eval -24,23] [%emt 0:00:11]} 22. Nc3 {[%eval -5,
26] [%emt 0:00:39]} Rd7 {[%eval -23,24] [%emt 0:00:14] (Ra8)} 23. Qe2 {[%eval
-5,23] [%emt 0:00:10]} Bd8 {[%eval -22,24] [%emt 0:00:24]} 24. Na4 {[%eval -17,
23] [%emt 0:00:10] (Kh2)} Nh5 {[%eval -28,23] [%emt 0:00:04]} 25. Qf2 {[%eval
-17,25] [%emt 0:00:14]} Bxg2 {[%eval -31,24] [%emt 0:00:15] (Bg4)} 26. Qxg2 {
[%eval -31,24] [%emt 0:00:38]} g6 {[%eval -23,24] [%emt 0:00:12]} 27. Kh2 {
[%eval -28,24] [%emt 0:00:13]} Nf6 {[%eval -31,23] [%emt 0:00:22]} 28. Rd1 {
[%eval -39,23] [%emt 0:00:27] (Qf3)} Bb6 {[%eval -31,23] [%emt 0:00:27] (Ng4+)}
29. Nxb6 {[%eval -34,25] [%emt 0:00:11]} axb6 {[%eval -47,22] [%emt 0:00:04]}
30. Bg5 {[%eval -17,20] [%emt 0:00:01]} Ng4+ {[%eval -40,23] [%emt 0:00:04]}
31. Kg1 {[%eval -31,25] [%emt 0:00:16]} b5 {[%eval -38,24] [%emt 0:00:13]} 32.
cxb5 {[%eval -35,22] [%emt 0:00:02]} cxb5 {[%eval -33,24] [%emt 0:00:10]} 33.
Rd5 {[%eval -51,25] [%emt 0:01:00] (Qe2)} Rc8 {[%eval -60,24] [%emt 0:00:27]
(Ra8)} 34. Qd2 {[%eval -41,23] [%emt 0:00:17]} f6 {[%eval -61,23] [%emt 0:00:
10]} 35. Be3 {[%eval -44,23] [%emt 0:00:07]} f5 {[%eval -80,21] [%emt 0:00:07]
(b4)} 36. exf5 {[%eval -42,20] [%emt 0:00:09]} gxf5 {[%eval -54,21] [%emt 0:00:
04]} 37. Rxb5 {[%eval -43,19] [%emt 0:00:01]} Nf6 {[%eval -59,22] [%emt 0:00:
13]} 38. Rc1 {[%eval -51,20] [%emt 0:00:06]} Rxc1+ {[%eval -97,22] [%emt 0:00:
13]} 39. Qxc1 {[%eval -46,17] [%emt 0:00:02]} f4 {[%eval -108,21] [%emt 0:00:
03]} 40. Bd2 {[%eval -53,20] [%emt 0:00:08] (Bf2)} f3 {[%eval -132,20] [%emt 0:
00:07] (d5)} 41. Qc4 {[%eval -124,20] [%emt 0:00:10] (Rb8+)} d5 {[%eval -202,
22] [%emt 0:00:05] (Kf7)} 42. Qc2 {[%eval -246,22] [%emt 0:00:20] (Rb8+)} Kf7 {
[%eval -291,20] [%emt 0:00:06] (Ne4)} 43. Rc5 {[%eval -305,22] [%emt 0:00:10]}
Ne4 {[%eval -337,23] [%emt 0:00:05]} 44. Rc6 {[%eval -365,23] [%emt 0:00:08]}
f2+ {[%eval -481,25] [%emt 0:00:08]} 45. Kg2 {[%eval -380,22] [%emt 0:00:01]}
Qh3+ {[%eval -544,25] [%emt 0:00:05]} 46. Kxh3 {[%eval -437,27] [%emt 0:00:08]}
f1=Q+ {[%eval -625,26] [%emt 0:00:15]} 47. Kg4 {[%eval -446,22] [%emt 0:00:01]}
Qe2+ {[%eval -661,26] [%emt 0:00:11]} 48. Kh3 {[%eval -655,23] [%emt 0:00:05]}
Qf3 {[%eval -700,27] [%emt 0:00:22]} 49. Be1 {[%eval -676,20] [%emt 0:00:01]}
Qh1+ {[%eval -710,25] [%emt 0:00:03]} 50. Qh2 {[%eval -756,23] [%emt 0:00:07]}
Qxe1 {[%eval -716,24] [%emt 0:00:10]} 0-1
[Event "SF 251015 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 6m+4"]
[Site "AMD X6 1090T 3200 Mhz (Fritzm"]
[Date "2015.10.30"]
[Round "51"]
[White "Stockfish 251015 64"]
[Black "Komodo 9.2 64-bit"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "D37"]
[Annotator "0.24;0.17"]
[PlyCount "156"]
[TimeControl "360+4"]
{AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor 3207 MHz W=32.0 plies; 5.605kN/s B=25.
7 plies; 5.355kN/s} 1. c4 Nf6 2. d4 c6 3. Bf4 d5 4. e3 e6 5. Nc3 Be7 6. Nf3
Nbd7 7. c5 Nh5 8. Bd3 O-O {Both last book move} 9. Qc2 {[%eval 24,23] [%emt 0:
00:14]} g6 {[%eval 17,24] [%emt 0:00:20] (Nxf4)} 10. Bh6 {[%eval 22,24] [%emt
0:00:12] (0-0)} Re8 {[%eval 5,21] [%emt 0:00:04]} 11. b4 {[%eval 26,23] [%emt
0:00:03]} a5 {[%eval 9,23] [%emt 0:00:10]} 12. b5 {[%eval 7,25] [%emt 0:00:33]}
e5 {[%eval 0,23] [%emt 0:00:06]} 13. Be2 {[%eval 14,22] [%emt 0:00:01]} exd4 {
[%eval 0,23] [%emt 0:00:17]} 14. exd4 {[%eval 8,25] [%emt 0:00:22]} Ng7 {
[%eval 10,23] [%emt 0:00:11]} 15. Rd1 {[%eval 10,23] [%emt 0:00:12]} Bf6 {
[%eval 2,23] [%emt 0:00:06]} 16. O-O {[%eval 16,24] [%emt 0:00:13]} Nf8 {
[%eval 9,22] [%emt 0:00:05]} 17. bxc6 {[%eval 7,24] [%emt 0:00:07]} bxc6 {
[%eval 7,23] [%emt 0:00:07]} 18. Qa4 {[%eval 0,26] [%emt 0:00:27]} Bd7 {[%eval
17,25] [%emt 0:00:27]} 19. Bd2 {[%eval 5,27] [%emt 0:00:14] (Bd3)} Nfe6 {
[%eval -7,23] [%emt 0:00:08]} 20. Bd3 {[%eval 0,24] [%emt 0:00:01]} Ng5 {
[%eval 0,26] [%emt 0:00:23]} 21. Ne5 {[%eval 0,26] [%emt 0:00:07]} Bxe5 {
[%eval 0,24] [%emt 0:00:05]} 22. dxe5 {[%eval 0,27] [%emt 0:00:07]} N5e6 {
[%eval 0,25] [%emt 0:00:12]} 23. Qa3 {[%eval 0,26] [%emt 0:00:12] (Qc2)} Bc8 {
[%eval 0,26] [%emt 0:00:24]} 24. f4 {[%eval 0,27] [%emt 0:00:15] (Na4)} Ba6 {
[%eval -2,22] [%emt 0:00:07]} 25. Bxa6 {[%eval 0,26] [%emt 0:00:01]} Rxa6 {
[%eval 0,24] [%emt 0:00:08]} 26. Na4 {[%eval 0,26] [%emt 0:00:09] (Rb1)} Ra7 {
[%eval -6,23] [%emt 0:00:10] (h5)} 27. Qf3 {[%eval -16,24] [%emt 0:00:46] (Rb1)
} h5 {[%eval -22,20] [%emt 0:00:06]} 28. Rb1 {[%eval -21,24] [%emt 0:00:07]}
Nf5 {[%eval -24,21] [%emt 0:00:07]} 29. Be1 {[%eval -31,24] [%emt 0:00:19]}
Ned4 {[%eval -33,23] [%emt 0:00:13]} 30. Qf2 {[%eval -36,21] [%emt 0:00:02]}
Qe7 {[%eval -46,23] [%emt 0:00:11] (f6)} 31. Rb6 {[%eval -43,23] [%emt 0:00:32]
(Qb2)} f6 {[%eval -81,22] [%emt 0:00:12]} 32. Bc3 {[%eval -58,21] [%emt 0:00:
13]} fxe5 {[%eval -73,22] [%emt 0:00:07]} 33. Rd1 {[%eval -64,21] [%emt 0:00:
09]} Rc7 {[%eval -70,22] [%emt 0:00:12]} 34. Rb2 {[%eval -69,22] [%emt 0:00:24]
} Qg7 {[%eval -79,23] [%emt 0:00:20] (Rb7)} 35. Rbd2 {[%eval -105,21] [%emt 0:
00:20]} Nh6 {[%eval -84,23] [%emt 0:00:09] (Rf7)} 36. fxe5 {[%eval -84,22]
[%emt 0:00:13]} Ne6 {[%eval -81,20] [%emt 0:00:05]} 37. Nb2 {[%eval -87,23]
[%emt 0:00:13] (Qe1)} Ng4 {[%eval -89,23] [%emt 0:00:17]} 38. Qg3 {[%eval -82,
23] [%emt 0:00:09]} Nxc5 {[%eval -81,25] [%emt 0:00:11]} 39. Re2 {[%eval -87,
22] [%emt 0:00:01]} Ne6 {[%eval -95,22] [%emt 0:00:17]} 40. Nd3 {[%eval -77,21]
[%emt 0:00:08]} Rf7 {[%eval -95,24] [%emt 0:00:09]} 41. h3 {[%eval -88,19]
[%emt 0:00:01]} Nh6 {[%eval -81,25] [%emt 0:00:41]} 42. Qh4 {[%eval -113,22]
[%emt 0:00:18] (Bb2)} Rff8 {[%eval -114,22] [%emt 0:00:14] (Qf8)} 43. Qa4 {
[%eval -101,22] [%emt 0:00:07]} Qa7+ {[%eval -97,23] [%emt 0:00:11]} 44. Kh2 {
[%eval -79,19] [%emt 0:00:01]} c5 {[%eval -110,23] [%emt 0:00:05]} 45. Qxa5 {
[%eval -80,23] [%emt 0:00:09] (Qc6)} Qxa5 {[%eval -93,23] [%emt 0:00:09] (Rf7)}
46. Bxa5 {[%eval -87,22] [%emt 0:00:09]} Nf5 {[%eval -118,24] [%emt 0:00:18]
(Rb8)} 47. Bb6 {[%eval -103,22] [%emt 0:00:12]} Rc8 {[%eval -118,23] [%emt 0:
00:04]} 48. a4 {[%eval -99,21] [%emt 0:00:01]} d4 {[%eval -116,23] [%emt 0:00:
05]} 49. a5 {[%eval -105,25] [%emt 0:00:12] (Ra2)} c4 {[%eval -126,23] [%emt 0:
00:05]} 50. Nb4 {[%eval -113,23] [%emt 0:00:13] (Ne1)} c3 {[%eval -134,19]
[%emt 0:00:05]} 51. Ra1 {[%eval -140,23] [%emt 0:00:21] (Rf1)} Rc4 {[%eval
-118,20] [%emt 0:00:05] (Ne3)} 52. Nd3 {[%eval -134,24] [%emt 0:00:06]} Ne3 {
[%eval -149,21] [%emt 0:00:04]} 53. Rea2 {[%eval -132,20] [%emt 0:00:01]} h4 {
[%eval -195,22] [%emt 0:00:16] (c2)} 54. Rb1 {[%eval -177,21] [%emt 0:00:11]
(Re1)} c2 {[%eval -433,23] [%emt 0:00:03]} 55. Rc1 {[%eval -551,22] [%emt 0:00:
06]} Rc3 {[%eval -521,25] [%emt 0:00:05]} 56. a6 {[%eval -596,24] [%emt 0:00:
05]} Rxd3 {[%eval -552,25] [%emt 0:00:03]} 57. a7 {[%eval -618,26] [%emt 0:00:
05]} Ra8 {[%eval -598,27] [%emt 0:00:05]} 58. Rcxc2 {[%eval -647,24] [%emt 0:
00:06]} Nxc2 {[%eval -653,28] [%emt 0:00:10]} 59. Rxc2 {[%eval -674,24] [%emt
0:00:06]} Rb3 {[%eval -676,27] [%emt 0:00:05] (Kf7)} 60. Rc6 {[%eval -735,29]
[%emt 0:00:17]} Kf7 {[%eval -755,27] [%emt 0:00:13]} 61. Rd6 {[%eval -779,24]
[%emt 0:00:05]} Rxb6 {[%eval -755,27] [%emt 0:00:03] (g5)} 62. Rxb6 {[%eval
-544,20] [%emt 0:00:04]} Rxa7 {[%eval -765,28] [%emt 0:00:04]} 63. Kg1 {[%eval
-596,21] [%emt 0:00:07] (Rb3)} Ra1+ {[%eval -800,27] [%emt 0:00:03] (Ra5)} 64.
Kf2 {[%eval -618,21] [%emt 0:00:04]} Ra2+ {[%eval -807,30] [%emt 0:00:23]} 65.
Kf1 {[%eval -622,19] [%emt 0:00:00]} d3 {[%eval -1111,23] [%emt 0:00:02] (g5)}
66. Ke1 {[%eval -1220,20] [%emt 0:00:10] (Rb7+)} Nc5 {[%eval -1427,24] [%emt 0:
00:13] (g5)} 67. g4 {[%eval -4429,23] [%emt 0:00:06] (Rf6+)} Ne4 {[%eval
-32737,16] [%emt 0:00:00]} 68. Kf1 {[%eval -32745,35] [%emt 0:00:03] (e6+)}
Ra1+ {[%eval -32739,18] [%emt 0:00:01]} 69. Kg2 {[%eval -32747,37] [%emt 0:00:
00]} d2 {[%eval -32747,18] [%emt 0:00:01]} 70. Rb7+ {[%eval -32749,42] [%emt 0:
00:04]} Ke6 {[%eval -32749,20] [%emt 0:00:01]} 71. Rb6+ {[%eval -32751,42]
[%emt 0:00:00]} Kxe5 {[%eval -32751,20] [%emt 0:00:01]} 72. Rb5+ {[%eval
-32753,55] [%emt 0:00:03]} Ke6 {[%eval -32753,21] [%emt 0:00:01]} 73. Rb6+ {
[%eval -32755,67] [%emt 0:00:03]} Nd6 {[%eval -32755,23] [%emt 0:00:01]} 74.
Rb1 {[%eval -32757,87] [%emt 0:00:03] (Rb4)} Rxb1 {[%eval -32757,27] [%emt 0:
00:01]} 75. Kf2 {[%eval -32759,127] [%emt 0:00:00]} d1=Q {[%eval -32759,46]
[%emt 0:00:01]} 76. Ke3 {[%eval -32761,127] [%emt 0:00:00]} Rb3+ {[%eval
-32761,99] [%emt 0:00:00]} 77. Kf2 {[%eval -32763,127] [%emt 0:00:00]} Qd2+ {
[%eval -32763,99] [%emt 0:00:00] (Ne4+)} 78. Kg1 {[%eval -32765,127] [%emt 0:
00:00] (Kf1)} Rb1# {[%eval -32765,99] [%emt 0:00:00]} 0-1
[/pgn]
-
whereagles
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:03 pm
Re: Stockfish vs Komodo 9.2(ct=0)
indeed... SF wandering around aimlessly, while K played with a purpose
-
beram
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm
Re: Stockfish vs Komodo 9.2(ct=0)
And here my latest results with privat testbook between opponents Stockfish is getting an edge of 54-57% in three latest testruns
I am just waiting for Komodo 9.3 will it be able to regain the lost terrain under these conditions
I am just waiting for Komodo 9.3 will it be able to regain the lost terrain under these conditions
Code: Select all
SF 121015 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 Stockfish 121015 64 BMI2 +28 +25/=58/-17 54.00% 54.0/100
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -28 +17/=58/-25 46.00% 46.0/100
SF 161015 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 Stockfish 161015 64 BMI2 +7 +18/=66/-16 51.00% 51.0/100
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -7 +16/=66/-18 49.00% 49.0/100
SF 211015 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 6m4s AMD 1090T @3200Mhz, 4cpu (Fritzmark 15,6)
1 Stockfish 211015 64 +20/=71/-9 55.50% 55.5/100
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit +9/=71/-20 44.50% 44.5/100
SF 241015 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 Stockfish 241015 64 BMI2 +35 +26/=58/-16 55.00% 55.0/100
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -35 +16/=58/-26 45.00% 45.0/100
SF 041115 - - Komodo 9.2(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 Stockfish 041115 64 BMI2 +42 +26/=60/-14 56.00% 56.0/100
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -42 +14/=60/-26 44.00% 44.0/100
SF 021115KP - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 Stockfish 021115 KP +10 +21/=61/-18 51.50% 51.5/100
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -10 +18/=61/-21 48.50% 48.5/100
SF 131115 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 Stockfish 131115 64 BMI2 +28 +22/=64/-14 54.00% 54.0/100
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -28 +14/=64/-22 46.00% 46.0/100
SF 141115 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 Stockfish 141115 64 BMI2 +45 +23/=67/-10 56.50% 56.5/100
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -45 +10/=67/-23 43.50% 43.5/100
SF 161115 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 Stockfish 161115 64 BMI2 +49 +23/=68/-9 57.00% 57.0/100
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -49 +9/=68/-23 43.00% 43.0/100
-
beram
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm
Re: Stockfish vs Komodo 9.2(ct=0)
A new record set in my tests by latest SF 121115 Ipman compile.beram wrote:And here my latest results with privat testbook between opponents Stockfish is getting an edge of 54-57% in three latest testruns
I am just waiting for Komodo 9.3 will it be able to regain the lost terrain under these conditions
Code: Select all
SF 121015 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 121015 64 BMI2 +28 +25/=58/-17 54.00% 54.0/100 2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -28 +17/=58/-25 46.00% 46.0/100 SF 161015 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 161015 64 BMI2 +7 +18/=66/-16 51.00% 51.0/100 2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -7 +16/=66/-18 49.00% 49.0/100 SF 211015 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 6m4s AMD 1090T @3200Mhz, 4cpu (Fritzmark 15,6) 1 Stockfish 211015 64 +20/=71/-9 55.50% 55.5/100 2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit +9/=71/-20 44.50% 44.5/100 SF 241015 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 241015 64 BMI2 +35 +26/=58/-16 55.00% 55.0/100 2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -35 +16/=58/-26 45.00% 45.0/100 SF 041115 - - Komodo 9.2(ct=0), Blitz 3m+2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 041115 64 BMI2 +42 +26/=60/-14 56.00% 56.0/100 2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -42 +14/=60/-26 44.00% 44.0/100 SF 021115KP - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 021115 KP +10 +21/=61/-18 51.50% 51.5/100 2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -10 +18/=61/-21 48.50% 48.5/100 SF 131115 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 131115 64 BMI2 +28 +22/=64/-14 54.00% 54.0/100 2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -28 +14/=64/-22 46.00% 46.0/100 SF 141115 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 141115 64 BMI2 +45 +23/=67/-10 56.50% 56.5/100 2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -45 +10/=67/-23 43.50% 43.5/100 SF 161115 - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) 1 Stockfish 161115 64 BMI2 +49 +23/=68/-9 57.00% 57.0/100 2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -49 +9/=68/-23 43.00% 43.0/100
A first time 60% in 100 games against Komodo 9.2
Not a big surprise as you consider it is the new number one in Tom Casanovas lists as well
Code: Select all
SF 121115IP - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 SF 121115IP 64 BMI2 +70 +33/=54/-13 60.00% 60.0/100
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -70 +13/=54/-33 40.00% 40.0/100-
beram
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm
Re: Stockfish vs Komodo 9.2(ct=0)
Just to check if earlier good result was no coincidence I did another test this time with TCEC7 finalbook
SF 121115IP now scores 56,25 %
SF 121115IP now scores 56,25 %
Code: Select all
SF 121115IP - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
(TCEC7finalbook 2x 64games)
1 SF 121115IP 64 BMI2 +44 +33/=78/-17 56.25% 72.0/128
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -44 +17/=78/-33 43.75% 56.0/128-
beram
- Posts: 1187
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:11 pm
Re: Stockfish vs Komodo 9.2(ct=0)
At longer time control Rapid 15m10s 20% more draws but nothing changes at outcome a clear win by SF 121115IP +10 -3 =37beram wrote:Just to check if earlier good result was no coincidence I did another test this time with TCEC7 finalbook
SF 121115IP now scores 56,25 %
Code: Select all
SF 121115IP - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Blitz 3m2s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1) (TCEC7finalbook 2x 64games) 1 SF 121115IP 64 BMI2 +44 +33/=78/-17 56.25% 72.0/128 2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -44 +17/=78/-33 43.75% 56.0/128
Code: Select all
SF 121115IP - Komodo 9.2(ct=0) Rapid 15m10s i5 4200M @2500Mhz, 2 cpu (Fritzmark 5,1)
1 SF 121115IP 64 BMI2 +49 +10/=37/-3 57.00% 28.5/50
2 Komodo 9.2 64-bit -49 +3/=37/-10 43.00% 21.5/50