CEGT - rating lists September 21th 2014

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

User avatar
Werner
Posts: 2872
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Germany
Full name: Werner Schüle

CEGT - rating lists September 21th 2014

Post by Werner »

Hi all, :D

our actual rating lists are online and can be found under the attached links.

40 / 20:
New games: 1623; 23 different engines
Total: 770.466

NEW Engines
488 Rodent 1.5 x64: 2637 - 700 games (+27 to v. 1.4)
718 Tucano 5.00 x64: 2496 - 601 games (+57 to v. 4.00)

UPDATES
1 Komodo 8.0 x64 4CPU: 3266 - 738 games (-5)
Gull 3.0 x64 3CPU: 3198 - 3120 games (+-0)
289 iCE 2.0 v2240 x64: 2747 - 804 games (+1)
458 Arasan 17.3 x64 1CPU: 2652 - 802 games (+2)

40 / 4:
no update: Testing Komodo 8 on different CPUs - see earlier posting.

40/120
See here our single-list:
http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn//40120n ... liste.html.
Last update was September 01st with 59 engines and 16050 games. We are testing Komodo 8.0.

5'+3'' pb=on
We are testing iCE 2.0 x64 - see more in our forum.

A big „Thank you“ to all testers as usual!!

Links

40/20: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating.htm
Blitz: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/blitz.htm
40/120: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating120.htm
Tester: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/testers/testers.htm
40/20 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating4020PBON.htm
5+3 pb=on: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rating5plus3pbon.htm
Games of the week: http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/40_40%2 ... on/gow.jpg

Werner Schuele
CEGT-Team
lkaufman
Posts: 5960
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:15 am
Location: Maryland USA

Re: CEGT - rating lists September 21th 2014

Post by lkaufman »

One point of interest I see on both the CEGT lists and the CCRL lists. On the blitz (40/4) lists, Stockfish 5 retains a slim lead over Komodo 8 regardless of the number of cores. But on the rapid (40/20 CEGT and 40/40 CCRL) lists, Komodo has a sizable lead over Stockfish 5 regardless of number of cores, and with four cores the lead in both lists is even larger than the estimated elo gains Stockfish claims since the release of SF5. So it appears that Komodo 8 scales better than SF5 to a quite significant degree. This is a bit of a (pleasant) surprise for me, because in the past I never noticed any scaling difference between SF and Komodo, although both scaled better than Houdini. Apparently something we did in Komodo 8 pays off better with more time.
Komodo rules!