ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
AdminX
Posts: 6396
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 2:34 pm
Location: Acworth, GA

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by AdminX »

Rebel wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Rebel wrote:
Steve B wrote:Has Rajlich even responded to any of this on any of the forums?
Rather then let the Rybka Party Faithful(Moderators,friends,,Aunts and Uncles ..long term posters,,etcetc) speak for him.. you would think by now..certainly now that Playchess has taken up the issue..he would speak out and try to defend himself or dispute the ICGA decision
if not..IMHO his total silence on the forums speaks volumes
either he cant defend himself or he simply could care less
im guessing its probably both
i cant imagine any other programmer remaining silent for so long..
im sorry it's way past due that he himself speak out
Muted Regards
Steve
Steve,

The big question is, provided Vas will speak right now, would that be of any help? Or will he be teared down into pieces ?

Bottom line, will he receive a listening ear ?

There has been a 5-6 year anti-Rybka campaign especially here at this forum and that has left its traces in the minds of many.
He has two very favorable platforms in which to speak up Ed
His own forum and now Playchess
you know as well as i do that you would have spoken up if you were accused in this way
sorry his silence is indefensible ..certainly now that the issue has gone viral on Playchess
Regards
Steve
Vas is taken your questions right now at RF.
Where is the link where Vas is answering / taking questions?
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 7562
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Full name: Ed Schröder

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by Rebel »

Steve B wrote: That is very welcome news
Perhaps the issue can now be advanced forward by the actual Programmer involved instead of fan clubs and other third parties
Best Regards
Steve
Yep.

Bob, Zach, Watkins, anybody can ask now.

We smoked him out :wink:
User avatar
Rebel
Posts: 7562
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:04 pm
Full name: Ed Schröder

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by Rebel »

AdminX wrote:
Rebel wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Rebel wrote:
Steve B wrote:Has Rajlich even responded to any of this on any of the forums?
Rather then let the Rybka Party Faithful(Moderators,friends,,Aunts and Uncles ..long term posters,,etcetc) speak for him.. you would think by now..certainly now that Playchess has taken up the issue..he would speak out and try to defend himself or dispute the ICGA decision
if not..IMHO his total silence on the forums speaks volumes
either he cant defend himself or he simply could care less
im guessing its probably both
i cant imagine any other programmer remaining silent for so long..
im sorry it's way past due that he himself speak out
Muted Regards
Steve
Steve,

The big question is, provided Vas will speak right now, would that be of any help? Or will he be teared down into pieces ?

Bottom line, will he receive a listening ear ?

There has been a 5-6 year anti-Rybka campaign especially here at this forum and that has left its traces in the minds of many.
He has two very favorable platforms in which to speak up Ed
His own forum and now Playchess
you know as well as i do that you would have spoken up if you were accused in this way
sorry his silence is indefensible ..certainly now that the issue has gone viral on Playchess
Regards
Steve
Vas is taken your questions right now at RF.
Where is the link where Vas is answering / taking questions?
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... ?tid=23957
User avatar
natasha
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:10 pm

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by natasha »

Rebel wrote:
AdminX wrote:
Rebel wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Rebel wrote:
Steve B wrote:Has Rajlich even responded to any of this on any of the forums?
Rather then let the Rybka Party Faithful(Moderators,friends,,Aunts and Uncles ..long term posters,,etcetc) speak for him.. you would think by now..certainly now that Playchess has taken up the issue..he would speak out and try to defend himself or dispute the ICGA decision
if not..IMHO his total silence on the forums speaks volumes
either he cant defend himself or he simply could care less
im guessing its probably both
i cant imagine any other programmer remaining silent for so long..
im sorry it's way past due that he himself speak out
Muted Regards
Steve
Steve,

The big question is, provided Vas will speak right now, would that be of any help? Or will he be teared down into pieces ?

Bottom line, will he receive a listening ear ?

There has been a 5-6 year anti-Rybka campaign especially here at this forum and that has left its traces in the minds of many.
He has two very favorable platforms in which to speak up Ed
His own forum and now Playchess
you know as well as i do that you would have spoken up if you were accused in this way
sorry his silence is indefensible ..certainly now that the issue has gone viral on Playchess
Regards
Steve
Vas is taken your questions right now at RF.
Where is the link where Vas is answering / taking questions?
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... ?tid=23957

you mean this crapp :?:


/ A Big Thanks and a Small Update
- - By Vasik Rajlich (Silver) [pl] Date 2012-01-08 15:08
I want to give a really big thanks to Ed Schroder, Soren Riis, Chris Whittington, Nelson Hernandez, Nick Carlin, Jeroen Noomen and Alan Sassler for their superb efforts in defending me against the accusations that I have broken ICGA tournament rules. Soren did a great job detailing the shenanigans pulled during the ICGA's investigation, from stacking the jury to premature public accusations to a comprehensive fabrication of evidence.

I also appreciate the tenacity of Chris Whittington and especially Ed Schroder in digging through the mountains of documents and answering them point by point.

Finally, I greatly appreciate the support that I have received from countless others. This support has been touching and uplifting and I really appreciate it. Thanks guys! :smile:

In other news, I'm working on Rybka. :smile: Rybka 5 will be ready sometime this year and the remote Rybka renting will be launched sometime after that. We'll make announcements on our web site and in our forum when we have more information. It should be a fun year.

@@
do not see
an answer to this

Parent - By Loboestepario (****) [us] Date 2012-01-08 16:52
Would you like to provide a technical commentary on Mark Watkins' response to the 4-part article published by Chessbase?
http://harveywilliamson.com/ICGA/Riis3.pdf
bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by bob »

natasha wrote:
bob wrote:If you are calling Riis' article "garbage" then we actually agree on something.

garbage is generally the bi product of usefully things


so we cannot agree with you :cry:


:lol:
Point taken, so I retract my agreement. :)
bob
Posts: 20943
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Birmingham, AL

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by bob »

natasha wrote:
Rebel wrote:
AdminX wrote:
Rebel wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Rebel wrote:
Steve B wrote:Has Rajlich even responded to any of this on any of the forums?
Rather then let the Rybka Party Faithful(Moderators,friends,,Aunts and Uncles ..long term posters,,etcetc) speak for him.. you would think by now..certainly now that Playchess has taken up the issue..he would speak out and try to defend himself or dispute the ICGA decision
if not..IMHO his total silence on the forums speaks volumes
either he cant defend himself or he simply could care less
im guessing its probably both
i cant imagine any other programmer remaining silent for so long..
im sorry it's way past due that he himself speak out
Muted Regards
Steve
Steve,

The big question is, provided Vas will speak right now, would that be of any help? Or will he be teared down into pieces ?

Bottom line, will he receive a listening ear ?

There has been a 5-6 year anti-Rybka campaign especially here at this forum and that has left its traces in the minds of many.
He has two very favorable platforms in which to speak up Ed
His own forum and now Playchess
you know as well as i do that you would have spoken up if you were accused in this way
sorry his silence is indefensible ..certainly now that the issue has gone viral on Playchess
Regards
Steve
Vas is taken your questions right now at RF.
Where is the link where Vas is answering / taking questions?
http://rybkaforum.net/cgi-bin/rybkaforu ... ?tid=23957

you mean this crapp :?:


/ A Big Thanks and a Small Update
- - By Vasik Rajlich (Silver) [pl] Date 2012-01-08 15:08
I want to give a really big thanks to Ed Schroder, Soren Riis, Chris Whittington, Nelson Hernandez, Nick Carlin, Jeroen Noomen and Alan Sassler for their superb efforts in defending me against the accusations that I have broken ICGA tournament rules. Soren did a great job detailing the shenanigans pulled during the ICGA's investigation, from stacking the jury to premature public accusations to a comprehensive fabrication of evidence.

I also appreciate the tenacity of Chris Whittington and especially Ed Schroder in digging through the mountains of documents and answering them point by point.

Finally, I greatly appreciate the support that I have received from countless others. This support has been touching and uplifting and I really appreciate it. Thanks guys! :smile:

In other news, I'm working on Rybka. :smile: Rybka 5 will be ready sometime this year and the remote Rybka renting will be launched sometime after that. We'll make announcements on our web site and in our forum when we have more information. It should be a fun year.

@@
do not see
an answer to this

Parent - By Loboestepario (****) [us] Date 2012-01-08 16:52
Would you like to provide a technical commentary on Mark Watkins' response to the 4-part article published by Chessbase?
http://harveywilliamson.com/ICGA/Riis3.pdf
Well, he DOES seem to be taking questions. Haven't seen any ANSWERS yet. maybe he will surprise?
dj
Posts: 8713
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 11:06 am
Location: this sceptred isle

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by dj »

bob wrote:First, an introduction letter from David:
David Levy wrote:
Subject: The ICGA's rebuttal to Soren Riis's article on Chessbase.com re
the Rybka scandal


This week Dr Soren Riis posted a four part article on Chessbase.com in a
somewhat belated attempt to defend Vasik Rajlich. Regular readers will
recall that Rajlich's actions led the International Computer Games
Association (ICGA) to find him guilty of breaking a crucial tournament rule,
as a result of which the chess program Rybka was stripped of its World
Computer Chess Champion titles and Rajlich was banned for life from ICGA
events.



Dr Riis gave his article a title to suggest that a miscarriage of justice
has taken place. The ICGA now responds with two rebuttal articles, one by
myself (as President of the ICGA) concerning some of the legalistic points
raised by Riis's article, and a robust detailed and thorough technical
rebuttal by Mark Watkins.


Everyone interested in the Rybka scandal should read both of these
rebuttals and then decide for themselves who and what they believe - Dr Riis
or the ICGA's investigation report.


Dr David Levy
President - ICGA
Here are two links, to read David's direct analysis, click the following link:
http://www.harveywilliamson.com/ICGA/DL ... th2012.doc

To read Mark's point-by-point evisceration of Soren Riis' article, click the following link:
http://harveywilliamson.com/ICGA/Riis3.pdf

Since there was no technical content, I removed the other thread to avoid confusion. Future comments should go here, this one will stick around.
When members sought to post either the pro-Rajlich views of Søren Riis or neutral comments on the issue then they were all shunted off to the invisibility (to non-members) of the Engine Forum. Yet when the Grand Inquisitor himself initiates yet another unending spew of anti-Rajlich posts then the thread is put - and remains - on the main CCC forum.

Is there any reason for this - other than the one that is obvious to all of us?
User avatar
Rolf
Posts: 6081
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 11:14 pm
Location: Munster, Nuremberg, Princeton

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by Rolf »

dj wrote:Yet when the Grand Inquisitor himself initiates yet another unending spew of anti-Rajlich posts then the thread is put - and remains - on the main CCC forum.

Is there any reason for this - other than the one that is obvious to all of us?
Love it. Miss you. All the best, DJ!
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
dj
Posts: 8713
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 11:06 am
Location: this sceptred isle

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by dj »

Rolf wrote:
dj wrote:Yet when the Grand Inquisitor himself initiates yet another unending spew of anti-Rajlich posts then the thread is put - and remains - on the main CCC forum.

Is there any reason for this - other than the one that is obvious to all of us?
Love it. Miss you. All the best, DJ!
Belated new year greetings to you, Rolf.
User avatar
natasha
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:10 pm

Re: ICGA response to ChessBase 4-part article

Post by natasha »

bob wrote:
natasha wrote:
bob wrote:If you are calling Riis' article "garbage" then we actually agree on something.

garbage is generally the bi product of usefully things


so we cannot agree with you :cry:


:lol:
Point taken, so I retract my agreement. :)
+1 :lol: