CCC Practice Game

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

Christopher Conkie
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)

Post by Christopher Conkie »

tano-urayoan wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
I doubt it will play Rfd1 if we play a5. I could be wrong but I do doubt it highly. If (and it is a big if) we got Rfd1 then a4 straight away.

Most likely is that we get Bc5 however.

Christopher
So no Bd3 no Rfd1, why are we having so much trouble against this patzer?
No one is listening?

Just a guess.....

:lol:

Look at Graham. Even when I tell him that after Rdf1 (in the unlikely event it plays Rfd1) then we play a4.......he insists on giving lines as a refutation that do not include a4.

The point of a5 is to play a4. See Miguel's post. It's not rocket science. We just should follow the theme through.

After a5 Rfd1 a4......we probably get Bd3 but it's too late then for Bd3. The queenside pressure is already on.

Here is the full line.

a5 Rfd1 a4 Bd3 g6 Qg4 Ra5.......

After that all it has is Qb4 or Bh6 (which if it plays Bh6 is happy days for us). Bg7 and Qa8 spring to mind.

Christopher
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44323
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)

Post by Graham Banks »

tano-urayoan wrote:
Graham Banks wrote: 15... a5 16 Rfd1 Qc7 17.Bc5 Rfb8 18.Bd6
15... a5 16 Rfd1 Qc7 17.Bc5 Rfc8 18. Bd6 Qb6; 19.Bd3 g6; 20.Bxg6?
So Qc7 is no good. It seems Rfd1 is a very strong move Graham.
Maybe 15...a5 16. Rfd1 g6 now.

Another move instead of a5, g6, or Be4 could be d6.
15...a5 16. Rfd1 g6; 17.Qg4, Rb8; 18.Bc5, Re8; 19.Bd3 might be tricky for Black.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
Christopher Conkie
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)

Post by Christopher Conkie »

Graham Banks wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote: I doubt it will play Rfd1 if we play a5. I could be wrong but I do doubt it highly. If (and it is a big if) we got Rfd1 then a4 straight away.

Most likely is that we get Bc5 however.

Christopher
15......a5; 16.Rfd1, a4; 17.Bc5 could still be troublesome if you look further at it.
17. Bc5 gets 17.......Ra5!! and we have equalised (or are even in front).

Christopher
Christopher Conkie
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)

Post by Christopher Conkie »

Graham Banks wrote:
tano-urayoan wrote:
Graham Banks wrote: 15... a5 16 Rfd1 Qc7 17.Bc5 Rfb8 18.Bd6
15... a5 16 Rfd1 Qc7 17.Bc5 Rfc8 18. Bd6 Qb6; 19.Bd3 g6; 20.Bxg6?
So Qc7 is no good. It seems Rfd1 is a very strong move Graham.
Maybe 15...a5 16. Rfd1 g6 now.

Another move instead of a5, g6, or Be4 could be d6.
15...a5 16. Rfd1 g6; 17.Qg4, Rb8; 18.Bc5, Re8; 19.Bd3 might be tricky for Black.
Last time Graham......

If we play a5 and it then plays Rfd1 (but it won't I think) we play a4.

Not g6.......a4 ok?

Christopher
Steve B
Posts: 3697
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:26 pm

Re: Move 16

Post by Steve B »

Zach Wegner wrote:Also, Steve, would it be too much trouble to edit the original post with the current position after each move? As each move is taking up at least a few pages for voting, it's sometimes a pain to have to wade through it all.
Sure Zach

original post edited to include current position
Even More Work Regards
Steve
:P
Last edited by Steve B on Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44323
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)

Post by Graham Banks »

Christopher Conkie wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote: I doubt it will play Rfd1 if we play a5. I could be wrong but I do doubt it highly. If (and it is a big if) we got Rfd1 then a4 straight away.

Most likely is that we get Bc5 however.

Christopher
15......a5; 16.Rfd1, a4; 17.Bc5 could still be troublesome if you look further at it.
17. Bc5 gets 17.......Ra5!! and we have equalised (or are even in front).

Christopher
Okay - looking now at the obvious Ra5. You could well be right! :wink:
gbanksnz at gmail.com
BubbaTough
Posts: 1154
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:18 am

Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)

Post by BubbaTough »

Christopher Conkie wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote: I doubt it will play Rfd1 if we play a5. I could be wrong but I do doubt it highly. If (and it is a big if) we got Rfd1 then a4 straight away.

Most likely is that we get Bc5 however.

Christopher
15......a5; 16.Rfd1, a4; 17.Bc5 could still be troublesome if you look further at it.
17. Bc5 gets 17.......Ra5!! and we have equalised (or are even in front).

Christopher
I don't have a board in front of me, but here is what I had on the ...a5 and then ....a4 idea (boy, its getting to be a pain to scroll back in the thread to quote myself):

15...a5 16. Bd3 g6 17. Qg4 and I am not sure what to do for black here. 17...a4 is met with 18 b4, but I don't see much better.
If memory serves, the b pawn looked pretty annoying in this position (after axb axb). If Chris and folks can find a way to get ....a5, ....a4 to work without some preliminary work I am all for it. I couldn't find it.

-Sam
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44323
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)

Post by Graham Banks »

Graham Banks wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote: I doubt it will play Rfd1 if we play a5. I could be wrong but I do doubt it highly. If (and it is a big if) we got Rfd1 then a4 straight away.

Most likely is that we get Bc5 however.

Christopher
15......a5; 16.Rfd1, a4; 17.Bc5 could still be troublesome if you look further at it.
17. Bc5 gets 17.......Ra5!! and we have equalised (or are even in front).

Christopher
Okay - looking now at the obvious Ra5. You could well be right! :wink:
You're correct. White can't play Bc5 in that position because of Ra5. Let me see what else White may have.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
tano-urayoan
Posts: 638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: How to beat the TASC R30 (1993)

Post by tano-urayoan »

15...a5 16 Rfd1 a4 17 Bc5 and now what is your idea Ra5?

Instead of 17. Bc5 what about Bd3 now? 17...g6 18. Qg4 or Qe2?
Christopher Conkie
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Scotland

For Sam

Post by Christopher Conkie »

BubbaTough wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
Graham Banks wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote: I doubt it will play Rfd1 if we play a5. I could be wrong but I do doubt it highly. If (and it is a big if) we got Rfd1 then a4 straight away.

Most likely is that we get Bc5 however.

Christopher
15......a5; 16.Rfd1, a4; 17.Bc5 could still be troublesome if you look further at it.
17. Bc5 gets 17.......Ra5!! and we have equalised (or are even in front).

Christopher
I don't have a board in front of me, but here is what I had on the ...a5 and then ....a4 idea (boy, its getting to be a pain to scroll back in the thread to quote myself):

15...a5 16. Bd3 g6 17. Qg4 and I am not sure what to do for black here. 17...a4 is met with 18 b4, but I don't see much better.
If memory serves, the b pawn looked pretty annoying in this position (after axb axb). If Chris and folks can find a way to get ....a5, ....a4 to work without some preliminary work I am all for it. I couldn't find it.

-Sam
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 79&t=28922

Ra5

:)

Christopher
Last edited by Christopher Conkie on Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:11 am, edited 1 time in total.