ChessUSA.com TalkChess.com
Hosted by Your Move Chess & Games
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions
Moderators: Robert Hyatt, H.G.Muller, Harvey Williamson

Users browsing this forum: Piotr Cichy
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 294, 295, 296  Next
Post new topic
Author Date/Time
[Discussion] - Measuring move ordering Ed Schroder Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:35 pm
Some opening book design questions Nguyen Pham Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:07 pm
       Re: Some opening book design questions Jon Dart Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:36 pm
             Re: Some opening book design questions Nguyen Pham Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:22 am
                   Re: Some opening book design questions Jon Dart Thu Feb 22, 2018 2:55 pm
       Re: Some opening book design questions H.G.Muller Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:33 pm
             Re: Some opening book design questions Nguyen Pham Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:48 am
       Re: Some opening book design questions Bojun Guo Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:53 pm
             Re: Some opening book design questions H.G.Muller Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:16 pm
                   Re: Some opening book design questions Bojun Guo Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:42 pm
                   Re: Some opening book design questions Gerd Isenberg Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:32 pm
                         Re: Some opening book design questions H.G.Muller Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:55 pm
                         Re: Some opening book design questions Jon Dart Thu Feb 22, 2018 2:58 pm
             Re: Some opening book design questions Nguyen Pham Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:08 am
                   Re: Some opening book design questions Bojun Guo Thu Feb 22, 2018 4:24 pm
                         Re: Some opening book design questions Nguyen Pham Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:02 am
                               Re: Some opening book design questions Bojun Guo Fri Feb 23, 2018 6:56 am
                                     Re: Some opening book design questions Nguyen Pham Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:53 am
                                           Re: Some opening book design questions Bojun Guo Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:23 pm
                                           Re: Some opening book design questions Bojun Guo Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:55 pm
       Re: Some opening book design questions Dennis Sceviour Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:48 pm
             Re: Some opening book design questions Nguyen Pham Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:14 am
                   Re: Some opening book design questions Dennis Sceviour Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:43 am
                         Re: Some opening book design questions H.G.Muller Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:12 am
                               Re: Some opening book design questions Nguyen Pham Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:28 pm
                                     Re: Some opening book design questions H.G.Muller Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:17 pm
                                           Re: Some opening book design questions Nguyen Pham Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:10 am
                                                 Re: Some opening book design questions Jon Dart Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:14 am
3 million games for training neural networks Álvaro Begué Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:08 am
       Re: 3 million games for training neural networks Ferdinand Mosca Sat Feb 24, 2018 4:33 am
             Re: 3 million games for training neural networks Álvaro Begué Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:15 am
                   Re: 3 million games for training neural networks Ferdinand Mosca Sat Feb 24, 2018 11:41 am
       Re: 3 million games for training neural networks Juan Molina Sat Feb 24, 2018 7:27 am
       Re: 3 million games for training neural networks Srdja Matovic Sat Feb 24, 2018 9:45 am
       Re: 3 million games for training neural networks Richard Delorme Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:02 am
       Re: 3 million games for training neural networks Álvaro Begué Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:25 am
             Re: 3 million games for training neural networks Ferdinand Mosca Sat Feb 24, 2018 11:45 am
             Re: 3 million games for training neural networks J. B. Buijs Sat Feb 24, 2018 2:45 pm
Benchmarking Google's TPUv2 Carl Lumma Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:48 pm
       Re: Benchmarking Google's TPUv2 Robin Messemer Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:51 pm
Chess Programming Wiki Jon Dart Mon Feb 12, 2018 2:35 pm
       Re: Chess Programming Wiki Joseph Koss Mon Feb 12, 2018 3:11 pm
             Re: Chess Programming Wiki Joseph Koss Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:48 am
                   Re: Chess Programming Wiki Brahim Hamadicharef Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:49 pm
                   Re: Chess Programming Wiki Nguyen Pham Wed Feb 14, 2018 9:17 am
                   Re: Chess Programming Wiki Mark Lefler Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:47 pm
       Re: Chess Programming Wiki Gerd Isenberg Mon Feb 12, 2018 3:32 pm
             Re: Chess Programming Wiki Ed Trice Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:57 pm
                   Re: Chess Programming Wiki Mark Lefler Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:01 pm
                         Re: Chess Programming Wiki Ronald de Man Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:32 pm
                         Re: Chess Programming Wiki Ed Trice Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:07 am
                               Re: Chess Programming Wiki Gerd Isenberg Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:52 am
                                     Re: Chess Programming Wiki Ed Trice Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:22 pm
       Re: Chess Programming Wiki Rasmus Althoff Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:30 pm
             Re: Chess Programming Wiki Jesse Gersenson Mon Feb 19, 2018 4:48 pm
       Re: Chess Programming Wiki Vincent Lejeune Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:26 pm
Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Steve Maughan Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:28 pm
       Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Ed Schroder Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:10 am
             Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Steve Maughan Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:54 pm
       Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Marcel van Kervinck Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:23 am
             Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Jon Dart Fri Dec 20, 2013 12:27 am
       Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Thomas Petzke Fri Dec 20, 2013 7:07 am
       Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? H.G.Muller Fri Dec 20, 2013 8:42 am
       Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Lucas Braesch Sat Dec 21, 2013 6:36 am
             Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:56 am
                   Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Lucas Braesch Sat Dec 21, 2013 9:48 am
                         Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? H.G.Muller Sat Dec 21, 2013 11:23 am
                               Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 21, 2013 11:59 am
                                     Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? H.G.Muller Sat Dec 21, 2013 12:20 pm
                                           Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 21, 2013 12:35 pm
                               Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Sander Maassen vd Brink Fri Feb 23, 2018 7:33 am
                                     Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? H.G.Muller Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:55 am
                                           Re: Accessing Material Imbalance Information? Sander Maassen vd Brink Fri Feb 23, 2018 4:49 pm
On-line engine blitz tourney February H.G.Muller Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:16 am
       Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Folkert van Heusden Thu Feb 15, 2018 1:20 pm
       Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 15, 2018 2:50 pm
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Folkert van Heusden Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:04 pm
                   Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:13 pm
                   Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Daniel Anulliero Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:29 pm
                         Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 15, 2018 6:59 pm
       Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Vivien Clauzon Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:21 pm
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Robert Pope Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:57 pm
       ScorpioMCTS with treeht=infinity will be there. Daniel Shawul Sat Feb 17, 2018 3:19 pm
       Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Gregory Strong Sat Feb 17, 2018 5:31 pm
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February H.G.Muller Sat Feb 17, 2018 5:48 pm
       Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February H.G.Muller Sat Feb 17, 2018 11:09 pm
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Jonathan Rosenthal Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:24 am
                   Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Álvaro Begué Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:13 am
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February P. Kumar Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:43 am
                   Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February H.G.Muller Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:04 am
                         Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Colin Jenkins Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:53 am
                               Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Tamás Kuzmics Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:18 pm
             Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Guenther Simon Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:17 am
                   Re: On-line engine blitz tourney February Colin Jenkins Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:00 pm
I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:06 am
       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Marco Belli Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:47 am
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:03 am
       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Nguyen Pham Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:11 am
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:21 am
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Nguyen Pham Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:42 am
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Ronald de Man Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:51 am
                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:07 am
                               Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Ronald de Man Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:21 am
                                     Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:23 am
       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:42 am
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:05 am
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:27 am
                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:34 am
                               Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:54 am
                                     Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:00 am
                                           Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:09 am
                                           Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:20 am
                                                 Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:48 am
                                                       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 12:40 pm
       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:56 pm
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Ronald de Man Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:34 pm
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Sven Schüle Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:23 am
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Tue Feb 20, 2018 2:25 am
                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:39 am
                               Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Sven Schüle Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:37 pm
                                     Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:59 pm
                               Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Fulvio Benini Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:08 am
       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Martin Sedlak Sun Feb 18, 2018 5:39 pm
             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 5:59 pm
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Martin Sedlak Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:40 pm
                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:16 pm
                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Ronald de Man Sun Feb 18, 2018 8:39 pm
                               Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:06 pm
                                     Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Martin Sedlak Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:32 pm
                                     Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Ronald de Man Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:53 pm
                                           Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:58 pm
                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Martin Sedlak Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:33 pm
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:04 pm
                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Ronald de Man Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:12 pm
                               Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Sun Feb 18, 2018 10:05 pm
                               Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Robert Hyatt Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:22 am
                                     Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:14 am
                                           Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:33 am
                                                 Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Robert Hyatt Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:23 pm
                                                       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:52 pm
                                           Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:45 pm
                                                 Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:15 am
                                                       Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C H.G.Muller Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:34 am
                                                             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Robert Hyatt Thu Feb 22, 2018 2:21 am
                                                                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Ronald de Man Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:51 pm
                                                                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Robert Hyatt Fri Feb 23, 2018 4:12 am
                                                                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Thu Feb 22, 2018 5:58 pm
                                                                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Eugene Kotlov Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:16 pm
                                                             Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Rasmus Althoff Thu Feb 22, 2018 5:54 pm
                                                                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Robert Hyatt Fri Feb 23, 2018 4:22 am
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Lucas Braesch Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:45 am
                         Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Michael Sherwin Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:13 pm
                   Re: I'm not very happy with the do {} while() statement in C Robert Hyatt Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:13 am
cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Oliver Roese Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:20 am
       Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Álvaro Begué Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:25 pm
             Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Oliver Roese Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:33 pm
                   Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Álvaro Begué Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:39 pm
                         Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Oliver Roese Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:44 pm
                               Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Álvaro Begué Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:48 pm
                                     Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Oliver Roese Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:16 pm
                                           Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Hermann Krause Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:25 pm
                                           Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Álvaro Begué Wed Feb 21, 2018 6:10 pm
                         Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Oliver Roese Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:46 pm
                               Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Sven Schüle Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:03 pm
                                     Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Oliver Roese Thu Feb 22, 2018 7:18 am
                                           Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Hermann Krause Thu Feb 22, 2018 9:09 am
       Re: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Michael Rohleder Thu Feb 22, 2018 7:47 am
             SOLVED: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Linux Oliver Roese Thu Feb 22, 2018 9:28 am
                   Re: SOLVED: cutechess-cli produces no screen output under Li Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:48 am
Pawn Storm - Theory Dennis Sceviour Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:58 pm
       Pawn Storm - Application Dennis Sceviour Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:05 pm
       Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Jon Dart Thu Feb 15, 2018 2:05 am
             Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Dennis Sceviour Thu Feb 15, 2018 3:31 am
                   Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Jon Dart Thu Feb 15, 2018 2:43 pm
                         Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Daniel Anulliero Thu Feb 15, 2018 5:19 pm
                         Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Dennis Sceviour Thu Feb 15, 2018 7:49 pm
             Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Carl Langan Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:21 pm
                   Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Dennis Sceviour Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:56 pm
                         Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Carl Langan Thu Feb 22, 2018 12:08 am
                               Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Carl Langan Thu Feb 22, 2018 1:52 am
                                     Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Dennis Sceviour Thu Feb 22, 2018 2:06 am
                                           Re: Pawn Storm - Theory Carl Langan Thu Feb 22, 2018 2:13 am
Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Steve Maughan Mon Jan 29, 2018 11:43 am
       Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Robin Messemer Mon Jan 29, 2018 12:40 pm
             Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Álvaro Begué Mon Jan 29, 2018 12:49 pm
             Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Ed Trice Tue Feb 20, 2018 4:39 am
                   Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Steve Maughan Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:15 am
                   Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Robin Messemer Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:16 am
                   Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Jacob Wilkins Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:32 pm
                         Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Robert Pope Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:59 pm
                               Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Robin Messemer Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:54 pm
                   Re: Connect 4 AlphaZero implemented using Python... Evert Glebbeek Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:44 pm
Crazywa 1.0.5 source-code release H.G.Muller Sun Feb 18, 2018 7:13 pm
       Re: Crazywa 1.0.5 source-code release Gregory Strong Sun Feb 18, 2018 9:35 pm
             Re: Crazywa 1.0.5 source-code release H.G.Muller Mon Feb 19, 2018 1:47 pm
Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sun Feb 12, 2017 6:13 pm
       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Gerd Isenberg Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:04 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:43 pm
                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:45 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Vladimir Medvedev Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:52 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 13, 2017 4:11 pm
                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Gerd Isenberg Mon Feb 13, 2017 7:46 pm
                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:08 pm
                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:24 pm
                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:30 pm
                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:22 pm
                                                 Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:51 pm
                                                       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:26 am
                                                             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:42 am
                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:02 am
                                                 Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Dann Corbit Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:26 am
                                                       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:57 am
                                                             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:53 pm
                                                                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:55 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 1:23 am
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:36 pm
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces J. Wesley Cleveland Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:08 pm
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:05 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 4:11 am
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:45 pm
                                                                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:13 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 3:55 am
                                                                               Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Wed Feb 15, 2017 9:03 am
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:50 pm
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:50 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:20 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:38 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:25 am
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:00 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:14 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:31 pm
                                                                                     Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:20 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:16 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 8:23 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:55 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:00 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:13 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:48 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 3:55 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:18 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Thu Feb 16, 2017 7:27 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:47 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:23 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:49 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces J. Wesley Cleveland Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:56 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Roch Manilla Sun Feb 19, 2017 12:32 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sun Feb 19, 2017 5:44 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Greg Simpson Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:04 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Greg Simpson Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Martin Sedlak Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:17 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:35 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:31 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Daniel Anulliero Mon Feb 20, 2017 8:21 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Richard Delorme Mon Feb 20, 2017 2:13 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Jon Fredrik Åsvang Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:34 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:37 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:51 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Thu Feb 23, 2017 1:04 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 23, 2017 6:14 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:52 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:19 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:20 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sun Feb 26, 2017 4:56 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:21 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:21 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:23 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:31 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Michael B Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:39 am
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Mon Feb 27, 2017 2:58 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Sat Feb 18, 2017 8:33 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Rein Halbersma Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:16 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:06 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 16, 2017 4:10 pm
                                                                                           Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:51 pm
                                                             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 1:10 am
                                                                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Sven Schüle Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:29 pm
                                                                         Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ronald de Man Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:12 pm
                                                 Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:43 am
                                                       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 3:03 am
       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Alvaro Cardoso Mon Feb 13, 2017 9:21 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:50 pm
                   Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:08 am
       Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Krzysztof Grzelak Tue Feb 14, 2017 2:37 pm
             Re: Checkers Is Strongly-Solved for 8-pieces Ed Trice Sat Feb 17, 2018 7:16 pm
Compile stockfish 9? Dan Buske Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:04 pm
       Re: Compile stockfish 9? Louis Zulli Mon Feb 12, 2018 5:20 pm
       Re: Compile stockfish 9? Andrew Grant Fri Feb 16, 2018 5:59 am
             Re: Compile stockfish 9? Eelco de Groot Sat Feb 17, 2018 6:17 pm
Near-random movers Robert Pope Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:36 am
       Re: Near-random movers Ray Banks Wed Feb 14, 2018 5:11 am
       Re: Near-random movers Werner Taelemans Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:38 am
             Re: Near-random movers Robert Pope Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:34 pm
       Re: Near-random movers Álvaro Begué Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:33 pm
       Re: Near-random movers Folkert van Heusden Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:52 pm
       Re: Near-random movers Volker Annuss Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:41 pm
             Re: Near-random movers Robert Pope Thu Feb 15, 2018 2:17 am
                   Re: Near-random movers Volker Annuss Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:40 pm
                         Re: Near-random movers Robert Pope Thu Feb 15, 2018 8:54 pm
       Re: Near-random movers Luis Babboni Thu Feb 15, 2018 1:49 am
Learning piece-square table Mathieu Pagé Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:49 pm
       Re: Learning piece-square table Eugene Kotlov Tue Feb 13, 2018 1:49 pm
             Re: Learning piece-square table Mathieu Pagé Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:06 am
       Re: Learning piece-square table Jonathan Rosenthal Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:01 pm
             Re: Learning piece-square table Eugene Kotlov Tue Feb 13, 2018 5:36 pm
                   Re: Learning piece-square table Dann Corbit Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:40 pm
                         Re: Learning piece-square table Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:48 pm
                               Re: Learning piece-square table Dann Corbit Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:53 pm
                               Re: Learning piece-square table Robert Pope Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:54 pm
                                     Re: Learning piece-square table Álvaro Begué Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:58 pm
                         Re: Learning piece-square table Jonathan Rosenthal Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:43 am
             Re: Learning piece-square table Mathieu Pagé Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:15 am
                   Re: Learning piece-square table Evert Glebbeek Wed Feb 14, 2018 6:10 am
Deep misery Henk van den Belt Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:34 pm
       Re: Deep misery Álvaro Begué Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:48 pm
             Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:55 pm
                   Re: Deep misery Álvaro Begué Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:08 pm
                         Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:42 pm
                               Re: Deep misery Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:56 pm
                                     Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:17 pm
                                           Re: Deep misery Álvaro Begué Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:03 pm
                                           Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:19 am
                                                 Re: Deep misery Álvaro Begué Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:38 pm
                                                       Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Fri Feb 09, 2018 12:50 pm
                                                             Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:30 pm
                   Re: Deep misery Truls Edvard Stokke Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:38 pm
                         Re: Deep misery Henk van den Belt Tue Feb 13, 2018 10:45 pm
finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sat Feb 10, 2018 2:50 pm
       Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Guenther Simon Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:24 pm
             Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:52 pm
                   Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Guenther Simon Sat Feb 10, 2018 6:41 pm
       Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Ed Schroder Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:21 pm
             Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:45 pm
                   Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Ed Schroder Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:54 pm
                         Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:02 pm
                               Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Sander Maassen vd Brink Sun Feb 11, 2018 7:13 am
                               Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Ed Schroder Sun Feb 11, 2018 7:30 am
                                     Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Sander Maassen vd Brink Sun Feb 11, 2018 11:15 am
                                     Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sun Feb 11, 2018 11:26 am
                                           Re: finding eval swings in pgn? Erin Dame Sun Feb 11, 2018 8:42 pm
Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 09, 2017 2:54 pm
       Re: Gigatron emulation H.G.Muller Sat Dec 09, 2017 3:29 pm
             Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:08 pm
                   Re: Gigatron emulation H.G.Muller Sat Dec 09, 2017 4:37 pm
       Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 09, 2017 7:22 pm
             Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sun Dec 10, 2017 1:57 pm
             Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sun Feb 11, 2018 5:46 pm
       Re: Gigatron emulation Rémi Coulom Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:30 pm
             Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:50 pm
                   Re: Gigatron emulation H.G.Muller Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:03 pm
                         Re: Gigatron emulation Martin Sedlak Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:10 pm
                               Re: Gigatron emulation H.G.Muller Sat Dec 09, 2017 11:35 pm
magic number comprising offset Eugene Kotlov Wed Feb 07, 2018 1:23 pm
       Re: magic number comprising offset Gerd Isenberg Sat Feb 10, 2018 8:22 am
             Re: magic number comprising offset Eugene Kotlov Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:56 am
                   Re: magic number comprising offset Dann Corbit Sun Feb 11, 2018 10:47 am
       Re: magic number comprising offset Marco Belli Sat Feb 10, 2018 9:32 am
             Re: magic number comprising offset Eugene Kotlov Sat Feb 10, 2018 10:04 am
Post new topic    TalkChess.com Forum Index -> Computer Chess Club: Programming and Technical Discussions All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 294, 295, 296  Next
Page 1 of 296
Jump to:  
  You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Enhanced with Moby Threads